Cited by 38Innovative Human-Technology InteractionEthics and Social Impacts of AIUsability and User Interface Design

Co-designing AI Futures: Integrating AI Ethics, Social Computing, and Design

Loi, Daria, Wolf, Christine T., Blomberg, Jeanette L., Arar, Raphael, Brereton, Margot·2019·Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion

Abstract

As recent scholars have noted, there is little discourse amongst the HCI, interaction design, and UX communities on topics of AI and their relationship to design practice, a gap this workshop aims to address. Bringing together practitioners and researchers from a variety of backgrounds, this workshop sets out three goals: (1) identify case studies and projects at the intersection of HCI and AI, highlighting their ethical dimensions; (2) identify the chief challenges to HCI and AI collaborations and strategies to address them; and (3) foster a community for continued discourse and development on the intersections between AI Ethics, social computing, and design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3301019.3320000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Active collaboration among a wide and inclusive range of stakeholders in the development and deployment stages will improve the sustainability potential of AI.

    “Active collaboration among a wide and inclusive range of stakeholders-ideally in the form of quadruple helix model participation of public, private, academia and community-in the development and deployment stages, in particular, will improve the caliber of the sustainability potential of AI [180,181].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 38

Authors
Loi, D., Wolf, C. T., Blomberg, J. L., Arar, R., & Brereton, M.
Affiliations
  • Intel (United States) (US)
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
  • Khan Academy (US)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-06-18
Pages
381-384
OpenAlex
W2952249708
Cited by
38
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS Companion) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
AI ethics, human-computer interaction, interaction design, user experience design, co-design, social computing, interdisciplinary collaboration, design practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review