"Do you trust me?": Increasing User-Trust by Integrating Virtual Agents in Explainable AI Interaction Design
Abstract
While the research area of artificial intelligence benefited from increasingly sophisticated machine learning techniques in recent years, the resulting systems suffer from a loss of transparency and comprehensibility. This development led to an on-going resurgence of the research area of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) which aims to reduce the opaqueness of those black-box-models. However, much of the current XAI-Research is focused on machine learning practitioners and engineers while omitting the specific needs of end-users. In this paper, we examine the impact of virtual agents within the field of XAI on the perceived trustworthiness of autonomous intelligent systems. To assess the practicality of this concept, we conducted a user study based on a simple speech recognition task. As a result of this experiment, we found significant evidence suggesting that the integration of virtual agents into XAI interaction design leads to an increase of trust in the autonomous intelligent system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experimental work on trust in explainable ML has relied on subjective, self-reported measures of trust in performing a simplified task.
“The experimental work on the notion of trust has relied on subjective, self-reported measures of trust in performing a simplified task (Ribeiro et al., 2016; Weitz et al., 2019; Buçinca et al., 2020).”
From Explainable machine learning for public policy: Use cases, gaps, and research directions (2023) · cites this paper as Weitz et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Weitz, K., Schiller, D., Schlagowski, R., Huber, T., & André, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- 7-9
- OpenAlex
- W2953923985
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (16SV7960)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- explainable AI, virtual agents, trust in autonomous systems, interaction design, speech recognition, black-box models, user trust, end-user needs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review