Cited by 136Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyUsability and User Interface Design

"Do you trust me?": Increasing User-Trust by Integrating Virtual Agents in Explainable AI Interaction Design

Weitz, Katharina, Schiller, Dominik, Schlagowski, Ruben, Huber, Tobias, André, Elisabeth·2019·Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents

Abstract

While the research area of artificial intelligence benefited from increasingly sophisticated machine learning techniques in recent years, the resulting systems suffer from a loss of transparency and comprehensibility. This development led to an on-going resurgence of the research area of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) which aims to reduce the opaqueness of those black-box-models. However, much of the current XAI-Research is focused on machine learning practitioners and engineers while omitting the specific needs of end-users. In this paper, we examine the impact of virtual agents within the field of XAI on the perceived trustworthiness of autonomous intelligent systems. To assess the practicality of this concept, we conducted a user study based on a simple speech recognition task. As a result of this experiment, we found significant evidence suggesting that the integration of virtual agents into XAI interaction design leads to an increase of trust in the autonomous intelligent system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3308532.3329441

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental work on trust in explainable ML has relied on subjective, self-reported measures of trust in performing a simplified task.

    “The experimental work on the notion of trust has relied on subjective, self-reported measures of trust in performing a simplified task (Ribeiro et al., 2016; Weitz et al., 2019; Buçinca et al., 2020).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 136

Authors
Weitz, K., Schiller, D., Schlagowski, R., Huber, T., & André, E.
Affiliations
University of Augsburg (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-07
Pages
7-9
OpenAlex
W2953923985
Cited by
136
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10
FWCI
4.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (16SV7960)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
explainable AI, virtual agents, trust in autonomous systems, interaction design, speech recognition, black-box models, user trust, end-user needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review