Cited by 562Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Relational Ranking for Stock Prediction

Open access
Feng, Fuli, He, Xiangnan, Wang, Xiang, Luo, Cheng, Liu, Yiqun, Chua, Tat-Seng·2019·ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Abstract

Stock prediction aims to predict the future trends of a stock in order to help investors make good investment decisions. Traditional solutions for stock prediction are based on time-series models. With the recent success of deep neural networks in modeling sequential data, deep learning has become a promising choice for stock prediction. However, most existing deep learning solutions are not optimized toward the target of investment, i.e., selecting the best stock with the highest expected revenue. Specifically, they typically formulate stock prediction as a classification (to predict stock trends) or a regression problem (to predict stock prices). More importantly, they largely treat the stocks as independent of each other. The valuable signal in the rich relations between stocks (or companies), such as two stocks are in the same sector and two companies have a supplier-customer relation, is not considered. In this work, we contribute a new deep learning solution, named Relational Stock Ranking (RSR), for stock prediction. Our RSR method advances existing solutions in two major aspects: (1) tailoring the deep learning models for stock ranking, and (2) capturing the stock relations in a time-sensitive manner. The key novelty of our work is the proposal of a new component in neural network modeling, named Temporal Graph Convolution , which jointly models the temporal evolution and relation network of stocks. To validate our method, we perform back-testing on the historical data of two stock markets, NYSE and NASDAQ. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our RSR method. It outperforms state-of-the-art stock prediction solutions achieving an average return ratio of 98% and 71% on NYSE and NASDAQ, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3309547

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Adebiyi Ayodele Ariyo, 2014, Aderemi Oluyinka Adewumi, and Charles Korede Ayo
  2. Aggarwal Charu C., 2013, Reddy
  3. Alberg John, 2017, Lipton
  4. Antoine Bordes Nicolas Usunier Alberto Garcia-Duran Jason Weston and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS. 2787--2795. Antoine Bordes Nicolas Usunier Alberto Garcia-Duran Jason Weston and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS. 2787--2795.
  5. Joan Bruna Wojciech Zaremba Arthur Szlam and Yann LeCun. 2014. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. In ICLR. https://iclr.cc/archive/2014/conference-proceedings/. Joan Bruna Wojciech Zaremba Arthur Szlam and Yann LeCun. 2014. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. In ICLR. https://iclr.cc/archive/2014/conference-proceedings/.
  6. Kyunghyun Cho Bart van Merriënboer ÇaÄlar Gülçehre Dzmitry Bahdanau Fethi Bougares Holger Schwenk and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder--decoder for statistical machine translation. In EMNLP. ACL 1724--1734. Kyunghyun Cho Bart van Merriënboer ÇaÄlar Gülçehre Dzmitry Bahdanau Fethi Bougares Holger Schwenk and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder--decoder for statistical machine translation. In EMNLP. ACL 1724--1734.
  7. Michaël Defferrard Xavier Bresson and Pierre Vandergheynst. 2016. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In NIPS. 3844--3852. Michaël Defferrard Xavier Bresson and Pierre Vandergheynst. 2016. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In NIPS. 3844--3852.
  8. Ding Xiao, Deep learning for event-driven stock prediction (IJCAI)
  9. Dixon Matthew, 2016, Classification-based financial markets prediction using deep neural networks. Algorithmic Finance Preprint
  10. Claire Donnat Marinka Zitnik David Hallac and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Spectral graph wavelets for structural role similarity in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10321. Claire Donnat Marinka Zitnik David Hallac and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Spectral graph wavelets for structural role similarity in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10321. · arXiv
  11. Diederik, 2015, Kingma and Jimmy Ba
  12. Thomas, 2017, Kipf and Max Welling
  13. Alex, 2012, Krizhevsky
  14. Lo Andrew W., A Non-random Walk Down Wall Street
  15. Maas Andrew L., 2013, Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models, ICML, 30, 3
  16. Musgrave Gerald L., 1997, A random walk down Wall Street, Bus. Econ., 32, 74
  17. 10.5555/1331268.1331274 · DOI
  18. Richard Socher Danqi Chen Christopher D. Manning and Andrew Ng. 2013. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In NIPS. 926--934. Richard Socher Danqi Chen Christopher D. Manning and Andrew Ng. 2013. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In NIPS. 926--934.
  19. Weimer Markus, 2007, Smola
  20. Xu Yan, 2015, International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling (KAM). Atlantis Press, 197--198
  21. Zhu Xiaojin, 2003, Lafferty

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 562

Metadata

Authors
Feng, F., He, X., Wang, X., Luo, C., Liu, Y., & Chua, T.-S.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
1-30
ISSN
  • 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2868
OpenAlex
W2893230400
Cited by
553
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15
FWCI
30.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation, Prime Minister? Office, Singapore under its IRC@Singapore Funding Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
stock price prediction, stock ranking, time evolution, investment decision support, backtesting, New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review