The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral Models (Extended Version)
Open accessAbstract
As Android has become increasingly popular, so has malware targeting it, thus motivating the research community to propose different detection techniques. However, the constant evolution of the Android ecosystem, and of malware itself, makes it hard to design robust tools that can operate for long periods of time without the need for modifications or costly re-training. Aiming to address this issue, we set to detect malware from a behavioral point of view, modeled as the sequence of abstracted API calls. We introduce M A M A D ROID , a static-analysis-based system that abstracts app’s API calls to their class, package, or family, and builds a model from their sequences obtained from the call graph of an app as Markov chains. This ensures that the model is more resilient to API changes and the features set is of manageable size. We evaluate M A M A D ROID using a dataset of 8.5K benign and 35.5K malicious apps collected over a period of 6 years, showing that it effectively detects malware (with up to 0.99 F-measure) and keeps its detection capabilities for long periods of time (up to 0.87 F-measure 2 years after training). We also show that M A M A D ROID remarkably overperforms D ROID APIM INER , a state-of-the-art detection system that relies on the frequency of ( raw ) API calls. Aiming to assess whether M A M A D ROID ’s effectiveness mainly stems from the API abstraction or from the sequencing modeling, we also evaluate a variant of it that uses frequency (instead of sequences), of abstracted API calls. We find that it is not as accurate, failing to capture maliciousness when trained on malware samples that include API calls that are equally or more frequently used by benign apps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jolliffe, I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,310
Drebin: Effective and Explainable Detection of Android Malware in Your Pocket
Arp, D., Spreitzenbarth, M., Hübner, M., Gascon, H., & Rieck, K. (2014) · Proceedings 2014 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2014.23247 · Cited by 2,331
Dissecting Android Malware: Characterization and Evolution
Zhou, Y., & Jiang, X. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.16 · Cited by 2,133
DART: directed automated random testing
Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., & Sen, K. (2005) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/1064978.1065036 · Cited by 2,067
(2011) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2011.67 · Cited by 1,989
Arzt, S., Rasthofer, S., Fritz, C., Bodden, E., Bartel, A., Klein, J., Le Traon, Y., Octeau, D., & McDaniel, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation · doi:10.1145/2594291.2594299 · Cited by 1,396
Intrusion detection using sequences of system calls
Hofmeyr, S. A., Forrest, S., & Somayaji, A. (1998) · Journal of Computer Security · doi:10.3233/jcs-980109 · Cited by 1,313
Android permissions demystified
Felt, A. P., Chin, E., Hanna, S., Song, D., & Wagner, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2046707.2046779 · Cited by 1,291
Norris, J. R. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810633 · Cited by 1,239
Enck (2014) · doi:10.1145/2619091 · Cited by 1,203
Cited by
Jelodar, H., Bai, S., Hamedi, P., Mohammadian, H., Razavi-Far, R., & Ghorbani, A. (2026) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2026.104390 · Cited by 27
Are Machine Learning Models for Malware Detection Ready for Prime Time?
Cavallaro, L., Kinder, J., Pendlebury, F., & Pierazzi, F. (2023) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msec.2023.3236543 · Cited by 13
RacketStore: measurements of ASO deception in Google play via mobile and app usage
Hernandez, N., Recabarren, R., Carbunar, B., & Ahmed, S. I. (2021) · Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference · doi:10.1145/3487552.3487837 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Onwuzurike, L., Mariconti, E., Andriotis, P., Cristofaro, E. D., Ross, G., & Stringhini, G.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
- Published
- 2019-04-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 2471-2566 (ISSN-L)
- 2471-2574
- OpenAlex
- W2963204406
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral Models (Extended Version). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3313391
- The paper
- Onwuzurike, L., Mariconti, E., Andriotis, P., Cristofaro, E. D., Ross, G., & Stringhini, G. (2019). MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral Models (Extended Version). ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.