Cited by 84Innovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

GoalKeeper: Exploring Interaction Lockout Mechanisms for Regulating Smartphone Use

Kim, Jaejeung, Jung, Hayoung, Ko, Minsam, Lee, Uichin·2019·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Many people often experience difficulties in achieving behavioral goals related to smartphone use. Most of prior studies approached this problem with various behavior change strategies such as self-reflection and social support. However, little is known about the effectiveness and user experiences of restrictive and coercive interventions such as blocking. In this work, we developed "GoalKeeper," a smartphone intervention app that locks the user into the self-defined daily use time limit with restrictive intervention mechanisms. We conducted a four-week field experiment with 36 participants to investigate the effects and user experiences of varying intensities of restrictive interventions. The results showed that restrictive mechanisms are more effective than non-restrictive mechanisms such as warning. However, we found that restrictive mechanisms caused more frustration and pressure to the users, mainly due to diversity of usage contexts and needs. Based on our study results, we extracted practical implications for designing restrictive mechanisms that balance the intervention effectiveness for behavioral changes and the flexibility for user acceptability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3314403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 84

Authors
Kim, J., Jung, H., Ko, M., & Lee, U.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925797295
Cited by
84
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2017M3C4A7083534)
  • MSIT (2018R1C1B5044211)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
restrictive practices, intervention intensity, user frustration, user acceptance, mobile health apps, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review