Towards skill recognition using eye-hand coordination in industrial production
Abstract
Companies are re-focusing and making use of human labor [4, 21] in order to create individualized lot-size-1 products and not produce the exact same mass product again and again. While human workers can produce with a least with the same quality as machines do, they are not that consistent, so it's better to combine strengths of both men and machines [14]. In this work, we investigate how we can utilize how humans behave in relation to task-required skills levels. To do so we investigate hand-eye coordination on precision tasks, its relation to fine and gross motor skills, in an unconstrained industrial setting. This setting consists of an up to 22 tasks assembly processes of two variants of a high quality product. We establish that there is a high correlation between expected task required skill level and the captured hand eye coordination of expert factory workers and that hand eye coordination can be used to distinguish between fine and gross motor skills. In addition we provide insights how this can be exploited in future work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employees who are skilled in using hardware and software or have good hand-eye coordination can use AI tools more effectively and efficiently.
“For example, employees who are skilled in using hardware and software or have good hand -eye coordination can use AI tools more effectively and efficiently (Haslgrübler et al., 2019).”
From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations (2023) · cites this paper as Haslgrübler et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/5078 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
“For example, employees who are skilled in us-ing hardware and software or have good hand - eye coordination can use AI tools more effectively and efficiently (Haslgrübler et al., 2019).”
Method
- Authors
- Haslgrübler, M., Gollan, B., Thomay, C., Ferscha, A., & Heftberger, J.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Studio Pervasive Computing Applications, Vienna, Austria
- Fischer Sports GmbH, Austria
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-06-05
- Pages
- 11-20
- OpenAlex
- W2946325917
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (849976 u. 854184)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Keywords
- skills recognition, eye-hand coordination, fine motor skills, gross motor skills, human-robot collaboration, industrial assembly, workers, precision tasks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review