Cited by 9Robot Manipulation and LearningMotor Control and AdaptationErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Towards skill recognition using eye-hand coordination in industrial production

Haslgrübler, Michael, Gollan, Benedikt, Thomay, Christian, Ferscha, Alois, Heftberger, Josef·2019·Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments

Abstract

Companies are re-focusing and making use of human labor [4, 21] in order to create individualized lot-size-1 products and not produce the exact same mass product again and again. While human workers can produce with a least with the same quality as machines do, they are not that consistent, so it's better to combine strengths of both men and machines [14]. In this work, we investigate how we can utilize how humans behave in relation to task-required skills levels. To do so we investigate hand-eye coordination on precision tasks, its relation to fine and gross motor skills, in an unconstrained industrial setting. This setting consists of an up to 22 tasks assembly processes of two variants of a high quality product. We establish that there is a high correlation between expected task required skill level and the captured hand eye coordination of expert factory workers and that hand eye coordination can be used to distinguish between fine and gross motor skills. In addition we provide insights how this can be exploited in future work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3316782.3316784

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Employees who are skilled in using hardware and software or have good hand-eye coordination can use AI tools more effectively and efficiently.

    “For example, employees who are skilled in using hardware and software or have good hand -eye coordination can use AI tools more effectively and efficiently (Haslgrübler et al., 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslgrübler, M., Gollan, B., Thomay, C., Ferscha, A., & Heftberger, J.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • Studio Pervasive Computing Applications, Vienna, Austria
  • Fischer Sports GmbH, Austria
Venue
Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-06-05
Pages
11-20
OpenAlex
W2946325917
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (849976 u. 854184)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
skills recognition, eye-hand coordination, fine motor skills, gross motor skills, human-robot collaboration, industrial assembly, workers, precision tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review