Collaborative cloud-edge computation for personalized driving behavior modeling
Abstract
Driving behavior modeling is an essential component of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Existing methods usually analyze driving behaviors based on generic driving data, which do not consider personalization and user privacy. In this paper, we propose pBEAM, a collaborative cloud-edge computation system for personalized driving behavior modeling. The driving behavior model is built on top of Generative Adversarial Recurrent Neural Networks (GARNN), which adapts to the dynamic change of normal driving. Transfer learning from cloud to edge improves the model performance and robustness on the edge. We prune the deep neural networks in the cloud in order to minimize the model transferring load while maximally preserve the original model performance. A personalized edge model is trained on top of the pruned model using CGARNN-Edge (Conditional GARNN), which considers drivers' personal or contextual information as additional conditions. User privacy is well protected as no personal data needs to be uploaded to the cloud. Experimental results on driving data from both real world and driving simulator show that the proposed CGARNN-Edge achieves the best performance among all the methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
360+x combines 360° panoramic views, first-person and third-person perspectives, and integrates audio and textual descriptions, providing a foundation for multi-view scene understanding and multimodal fusion.
“For instance, 360+x [241] combines 360° panoramic views, firstperson, and third-person perspectives while integrating modalities such as audio and textual descriptions, providing a rich ex-perimental foundation for multi-view scene understanding and multimodal fusion research.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [241]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Qiao, M., Liu, L., Xu, Y., & Shi, W.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- IBM Research - Almaden (US)
- Denso (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-11-07
- Pages
- 209-221
- OpenAlex
- W2982789873
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- cloud-edge collaboration, driver assistance systems, neural network pruning, user privacy, driving data, driving simulator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review