The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of eye gaze interaction
Abstract
Eye gaze interaction can provide a convenient and natural addition to user-computer dialogues. We have previously reported on our interaction techniques using eye gaze [10]. While our techniques seemed useful in demonstration, we now investigate their strengths and weaknesses in a controlled setting. In this paper, we present two experiments that compare an interaction technique we developed for object selection based on a where a person is looking with the most commonly used selection method using a mouse. We find that our eye gaze interaction technique is faster than selection with a mouse. The results show that our algorithm, which makes use of knowledge about how the eyes behave, preserves the natural quickness of the eye. Eye gaze interaction is a reasonable addition to computer interaction and is convenient in situations where it is important to use the hands for other tasks. It is particularly beneficial for the larger screen workspaces and virtual environments of the future, and it will become increasingly practical as eye tracker technology matures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multimodal human–computer interaction: A survey
Jaimes, A., & Sebe, N. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.019 · Cited by 965
Jiang, M., Huang, S., Duan, J., & Zhao, Q. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298710 · Cited by 729
Eye Tracking and Eye-Based Human–Computer Interaction
Majaranta, P., & Bulling, A. (2014) · Human–Computer Interaction Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6392-3_3 · Cited by 530
Li, D., Winfield, D., & Parkhurst, D. J. (2006) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.531 · Cited by 371
Eye Tracking in User Experience Design
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-06867-6 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Sibert, L. E., & Jacob, R. J. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2000-04
- Pages
- 281-288
- OpenAlex
- W1979038477
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of eye gaze interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/332040.332445
- The paper
- Sibert, L. E., & Jacob, R. J. K. (2000). Evaluation of eye gaze interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
