The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Namibian Indigenous Communities Reflecting on Their Own Digital Representations
Abstract
Indigenous communities' narratives have all too often been created, documented, curated and digitalized by aliens. This digital othering has created widely disseminated images and perceptions of indigenous communities which are neither authentic, nor in line with what the communities consider a valid or worthwhile representation of themselves or their cultural heritage. This has led to misconstrued and stereotypical perspectives by outsiders about indigenous communities. Technological interventions with indigenous communities to promote their sovereignty, while sometimes challenging, have opened critical debates around communities' self-determination of digital representations of their own cultural identities and heritage. We have entered into a dialogue with two Namibian indigenous communities, who have been our design partners on technology projects aimed at safeguarding their own cultural heritage on their own terms. We are reporting from our long-term ovaHimba collaborator who has engaged in a reflection about the preservation of his traditions triggered by our joint digitalization efforts. Moreover, in response to the widespread stereotyping of members of San communities in contemporary Namibia, that directly influences their cultural identity; we have co-constructed a video conversation between Namibians and a rural San community. In this way, the remote community could consider outsiders' perceptions, reflect upon and actively re-construct their digital self-representa…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, these communities often face socioeconomic challenges, including limited access to inclusive education, sustainable agricultural practices, and opportunities for cultural expression in digital spaces [69].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Biesele , M. et al . 2012 . Ju|'hoan and =X'ao-||'aen documentation in Namibia: overcoming obstacles to community-based language documentation. Language Documentation and Description. Stuart McGill and Peter K. Austin, eds. SOAS. 72--89. Biesele, M. et al. 2012. Ju|'hoan and =X'ao-||'aen documentation in Namibia: overcoming obstacles to community-based language documentation. Language Documentation and Description. Stuart McGill and Peter K. Austin, eds. SOAS. 72--89.
- Biko S. 1978. I write what I like: a selection of his writings. Heinemann. Biko S. 1978. I write what I like: a selection of his writings. Heinemann. · DOI
- Blake , E. et al . 2011 . Case Study 11.1: Deaf Telephony : Community-Based Co-Design. Interaction Design : Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Y. Rogers et al., eds. Wiley . 412--413. Blake, E. et al. 2011. Case Study 11.1: Deaf Telephony: Community-Based Co-Design. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Y. Rogers et al., eds. Wiley. 412--413.
- 10.1145/3136560.3136581 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2 · DOI
- Dodd , V. 2002 . A Semiotic Analysis of The Great Dance -- A Hunter's Story in Relation to Media Representation of the San . Visual Anthropology. 15 , 2 (Jan. 2002), 221--238. Dodd, V. 2002. A Semiotic Analysis of The Great Dance -- A Hunter's Story in Relation to Media Representation of the San. Visual Anthropology. 15, 2 (Jan. 2002), 221--238.
- 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00626.x · DOI
- Fernando , K. et al . 2018 . A Contemporary Expression of the Namibian San Communities' Past and Present Sufferings Staged as an Interactive Digital Life Performance. Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives. D.S. Jat et al., eds. Springer Singapore . 205--221. Fernando, K. et al. 2018. A Contemporary Expression of the Namibian San Communities' Past and Present Sufferings Staged as an Interactive Digital Life Performance. Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives. D.S. Jat et al., eds. Springer Singapore. 205--221.
- Harrilal , B. et al. 2016. Complementing backyard-bedroom recording studios with a mobile app. (Maputo , Mozambique , Oct. 2016 ), 59--71. Harrilal, B. et al. 2016. Complementing backyard-bedroom recording studios with a mobile app. (Maputo, Mozambique, Oct. 2016), 59--71.
- 10.1145/1753326.1753522 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.004 · DOI
- Kapuire , G.K. et al . 2016 . Technologies to Promote the Inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge Holders in Digital Cultural Heritage Preservation. (Windhoek, Namibia , 2016), 6. Kapuire, G.K. et al. 2016. Technologies to Promote the Inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge Holders in Digital Cultural Heritage Preservation. (Windhoek, Namibia, 2016), 6.
- 10.1080/03768359908440089 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00130-1 · DOI
- Kral , I.B. 2010. Plugged in: Remote Australian Indigenous Youth and Digital Culture . Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research . Kral, I.B. 2010. Plugged in: Remote Australian Indigenous Youth and Digital Culture. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.
- 10.1080/02681102.2017.1323306 · DOI
- Maasz , D. et al . 2018 . A Digital Indigenous Knowledge Preservation Framework: The 7C Model--Repositioning IK Holders in the Digitization of IK. Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives. D.S. Jat et al., eds. Springer Singapore . 29--47. Maasz, D. et al. 2018. A Digital Indigenous Knowledge Preservation Framework: The 7C Model--Repositioning IK Holders in the Digitization of IK. Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives. D.S. Jat et al., eds. Springer Singapore. 29--47.
- 10.1177/1461444818765154 · DOI
- 10.1080/02500167.2013.852600 · DOI
- Nandos 2012. Nando's Diversity Advertisement. Nandos 2012. Nando's Diversity Advertisement. · DOI
- 10.1145/3136560.3136583 · DOI
- Sayre , S. 2006. Using video-elicitation to research sensitive topics: understanding the purchase process following natural disaster. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing . R. Belk, ed. Edward Elgar Publishing . 230--243. Sayre, S. 2006. Using video-elicitation to research sensitive topics: understanding the purchase process following natural disaster. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing. R. Belk, ed. Edward Elgar Publishing. 230--243.
- 10.1215/03335372-22-2-299 · DOI
- 10.1145/3283458.3283532 · DOI
- Suzman , J. 2001. An introduction to the regional assessment of the status of the San in Southern Africa . Legal Assistance Centre . Suzman, J. 2001. An introduction to the regional assessment of the status of the San in Southern Africa. Legal Assistance Centre.
- 10.1080/08949460600598711 · DOI
- 10.1037/tps0000076 · DOI
- Winschiers-Theophilus , H. et al . 2017 . A classification of cultural engagements in community technology design: introducing a transcultural approach. AI & SOCIETY. (Jun . 2017). Winschiers-Theophilus, H. et al. 2017. A classification of cultural engagements in community technology design: introducing a transcultural approach. AI & SOCIETY. (Jun. 2017).
- Winschiers-Theophilus , H. et al. 2012. Locally Situated Digital Representation of Indigenous Knowledge- Co-constructing a new digital reality in rural Africa . Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication ( 2012 ), 454--469. Winschiers-Theophilus, H. et al. 2012. Locally Situated Digital Representation of Indigenous Knowledge- Co-constructing a new digital reality in rural Africa. Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication (2012), 454--469.
- 10.1080/10447318.2013.765763 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stichel, B., Blake, E., Maasz, D., Stanley, C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Afrikaner, H.
- Affiliations
- Flensburg University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Namibia University of Science and Technology (NA)
- Computer Science, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Namibia
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-06-03
- Pages
- 51-59
- OpenAlex
- W2955885227
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Commission on Research, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- Indigenous self-representation, cultural heritage preservation, digitalization, Ovahimba, cultural identity, stereotypes, digital empowerment, community sovereignty, co-design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review