Cited by 15Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationLegal Issues in Education

Teaching Academic Honesty in CS50

Malan, David J., Yu, Brian, Lloyd, Doug·2020·Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Abstract

We aspire to teach academic honesty in CS50 at Harvard University not only by addressing academic dishonesty when it occurs but by addressing it before it does. By way of communication, course- and campus-wide awareness of policy, just-in-time prompts, interventional conversations, and problem sets have we tried to preempt submission of plagiarized work. But few interventions have had significant or lasting effects on the number of instances thereof. Most impactful has been the addition of one sentence to the course's syllabus, a "regret clause" that encourages students to come forward within 72 hours of some dishonest act on their part, before the course itself is even aware. While we might zero the work in question in such cases, we commit to not escalating the matter further to the university's honor council, where the outcome might instead be admonishment, probation, or even required withdrawal from the university itself. We instead advise students on how best to move forward and connect them as needed with support structures on campus for academics and mental health. Since 2014 have 89 students invoked the clause, between 1% and 3% of the course's student body each year.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3328778.3366940

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highlighting institutional plagiarism policies and highlighting academic good practice has been associated with reduced plagiarism in CS courses.

    “In such cases, highlighting institutional plagiarism policies and highlighting academic good practice has been associated with reduced plagiarism in CS courses [32,34].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 15

Authors
Malan, D. J., Yu, B., & Lloyd, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-02-26
Pages
282-288
OpenAlex
W3007438360
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
academic integrity, academic dishonesty, plagiarism avoidance, student interventions, honor codes, computer science education, student support services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review