Cited by 9Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsElectronic Health Records SystemsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Clinician Perspectives on the User Experience, Configuration, and Scope of Use of a Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Dashboard

Iott, Bradley, Caverly, Tanner, Fishstrom, Astrid, King, Darren, Meng, George, Flynn, Allen·2019·Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Abstract

To improve care coordination, forestall emergencies, and save costs, there is a growing movement to have patients at home habitually collect and provide data about their health status and related experiences to health care providers. One aspect of this movement involves the recurring use of reliable and valid questionnaires to collect and share patient reported outcomes (PRO) data. However, studies indicate that health care providers have a host of legitimate concerns about the systematic and routine collection, sharing, and use of PRO data. To explore these provider-specific concerns further, we developed a configurable prototype software application for use by providers and their patients called the PRO Data Dashboard (PDD). Using the PDD along with several written clinical case scenarios, we conducted focus groups with a diverse group of oncology care providers to generate findings relevant to the design, configuration, and use of PRO-based tools. We organized our findings into three categories: scope of use of PRO tools, configuration of PRO tools, and clinician user experience. We conclude that providers require fine-grained control over the configuration of PRO data collection and sharing features in e-Health applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3329189.3329198

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most included studies centered on participation of patients with cancer in UCD/HCD processes, while a smaller subset extended participation to include health care providers, clinicians, caregivers, and navigators.

    “Although most included studies centered on participation of patients with cancer in UCD/HCD processes, a smaller but important subset extended participation to include health care providers, clinicians, caregivers, and navigators [40,41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • User-Centered Design for Digital Patient-Navigation Tools in Oncology: Scoping Review

    Kheirinejad, S., White, B. M., Kheirkhah Rahimabad, P., Zink, J. A., Hashtarkhani, S., Kumsa, F. A., Rashid, R., Chinthala, L., Brett, C. L., Davis, R. L., et al. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/87686

    “Although most included studies centered on participation of patients with cancer in UCD/HCD processes, a smaller but important subset extended participation to include health care providers, clinicians, caregivers, and navigators [40,41].”

Authors
Iott, B., Caverly, T., Fishstrom, A., King, D., Meng, G., & Flynn, A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-20
Pages
21-30
ISSN
2153-1633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954281596
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (publishedVersion)
Funders
Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
patient-reported outcomes, e-health applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review