Cited by 254Interactive and Immersive DisplaysAugmented Reality ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

Context-Aware Online Adaptation of Mixed Reality Interfaces

Open access
Lindlbauer, David, Feit, Anna Maria, Hilliges, Otmar·2019·Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

Abstract

We present an optimization-based approach for Mixed Reality (MR) systems to automatically control when and where applications are shown, and how much information they display. Currently, content creators design applications, and users then manually adjust which applications are visible and how much information they show. This choice has to be adjusted every time users switch context, i.e., whenever they switch their task or environment. Since context switches happen many times a day, we believe that MR interfaces require automation to alleviate this problem. We propose a real-time approach to automate this process based on users' current cognitive load and knowledge about their task and environment. Our system adapts which applications are displayed, how much information they show, and where they are placed. We formulate this problem as a mix of rule-based decision making and combinatorial optimization which can be solved efficiently in real-time. We present a set of proof-of-concept applications showing that our approach is applicable in a wide range of scenarios. Finally, we show in a dual-task evaluation that our approach decreased secondary tasks interactions by 36%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3332165.3347945

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NASA-TLX questionnaire is susceptible to individual biases through user expectations, leading to improved assessments of user interfaces by belief and placebos.

    “Furthermore, the NASA-TLX questionnaire is susceptible to individual biases through user expectations, leading to improved assessments of user interfaces by belief and placebos [136].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction

    Kosch, T., Karolus, J., Zagermann, J., Reiterer, H., Schmidt, A., & Woźniak, P. W. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3582272 · Cited by 304 · see citing works

    “Pupil Diameter [4, 5, 9–11, 18–22, 27, 28, 39, 44–47, 55, 58, 62, 63, 72, 87, 92, 94, 99, 103, 107, 108, 112, 142, 143, 153, 154, 157, 165, 175, 187–189, 195, 199–201, 207, 215, 227, 236, 239, 248, 249, 255, 257, 266] Saccades [10, 21, 27, 44–47, 76, 87, 99, 165, 184, 193, 228, 236, 258] Eye Blinks…”

Authors
Lindlbauer, D., Feit, A. M., & Hilliges, O.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-17
Pages
147-160
OpenAlex
W2980956911
Cited by
254
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12
FWCI
13.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • European Research Council (StG-2016-717054 (OPTINT))
  • ETH Zurich Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme (ETH/Cofund 18-1 FEL-39)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
mixed reality interfaces, contextual adaptation, cognitive load, real-time optimization, combinatorial optimization, rule-based decision making, dual-task performance, secondary task interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review