Cited by 25Innovative Human-Technology InteractionSocial Robot Interaction and HRICybernetics and Technology in Society

Does Siri Have a Soul? Exploring Voice Assistants Through Shinto Design Fictions

Open access
Seymour, William, Van Kleek, Max·2020·Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

It can be difficult to critically reflect on technology that has become part of everyday rituals and routines. To combat this, speculative and fictional approaches have previously been used by HCI to decontextualise the familiar and imagine alternatives. In this work we turn to Japanese Shinto narratives as a way to defamiliarise voice assistants, inspired by the similarities between how assistants appear to 'inhabit' objects similarly to kami. Describing an alternate future where assistant presences live inside objects, this approach foregrounds some of the phenomenological quirks that can otherwise easily become lost. Divorced from the reality of daily life, this approach allows us to reevaluate some of the common interactions and design patterns that are common in the virtual assistants of the present.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3334480.3381809

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beyond poor user experience, there is a wellbeing concern related to relying on the Echo Show as a critical part of healthcare.

    “Our participants described both individual and shared frustrations directed at the device, but beyond poor user experience, there is a wellbeing [81] (sustained, positive, mental and physical functioning) concern here related to relying on Echo Show as a critical part of healthcare.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seymour, W., & Van Kleek, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-25
Pages
1-12
OpenAlex
W3010066263
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P00881X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
voice assistants, Shinto, kami, design fiction, speculative design, embodied presence, phenomenology of technology, everyday rituals, defamiliarization, Japanese mythology, human-technology interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review