The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DDTCDR: Deep Dual Transfer Cross Domain Recommendation
Abstract
Cross domain recommender systems have been increasingly valuable for helping consumers identify the most satisfying items from different categories. However, previously proposed cross-domain models did not take into account bidirectional latent relations between users and items. In addition, they do not explicitly model information of user and item features, while utilizing only user ratings information for recommendations. To address these concerns, in this paper we propose a novel approach to cross-domain recommendations based on the mechanism of dual learning that transfers information between two related domains in an iterative manner until the learning process stabilizes. We develop a novel latent orthogonal mapping to extract user preferences over multiple domains while preserving relations between users across different latent spaces. Combining with autoencoder approach to extract the latent essence of feature information, we propose Deep Dual Transfer Cross Domain Recommendation (DDTCDR) model to provide recommendations in respective domains. We test the proposed method on a large dataset containing three domains of movies, book and music items and demonstrate that it consistently and significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art baselines and also classical transfer learning approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems
Koren, Y., Bell, R., & Volinsky, C. (2009) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2009.263 · Cited by 11,673
Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.99 · Cited by 10,310
Self-citationItem-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Neural Collaborative Filtering
He, X., Liao, L., Zhang, H., Nie, L., Hu, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052569 · Cited by 6,652
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Seung, D., & Lee, L.-W. (2001) · Cited by 4,753
Transfer Feature Learning with Joint Distribution Adaptation
Long, M., Wang, J., Ding, G., Sun, J., & Yu, P. S. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.274 · Cited by 2,071
Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations
Schein, A. I., Popescul, A., Ungar, L. H., & Pennock, D. M. (2002) · Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/564376.564421 · Cited by 1,780
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, P., & Tuzhilin, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-01-20
- Pages
- 331-339
- OpenAlex
- W2996891863
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DDTCDR: Deep Dual Transfer Cross Domain Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3336191.3371793
- The paper
- Li, P., & Tuzhilin, A. (2020). DDTCDR: Deep Dual Transfer Cross Domain Recommendation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.3371793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.