Language-Agnostic Representation Learning for Product Search on E-Commerce Platforms
Abstract
Product search forms an indispensable component of any e-commerce service, and helps customers find products of their interest from a large catalog on these websites. When products that are irrelevant to the search query are surfaced, it leads to a poor customer experience, thus reducing user trust and increasing the likelihood of churn. While identifying and removing such results from product search is crucial, doing so is a burdensome task that requires large amounts of human annotated data to train accurate models. This problem is exacerbated when products are cross-listed across countries that speak multiple languages, and customers specify queries in multiple languages and from different cultural contexts. In this work, we propose a novel multi-lingual multi-task learning framework, to jointly train product search models on multiple languages, with limited amount of training data from each language. By aligning the query and product representations from different languages into a language-independent vector space of queries and products, respectively, the proposed model improves the performance over baseline search models in any given language. We evaluate the performance of our model on real data collected from a leading e-commerce service. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates up to 23% relative improvement in the classification F1-score compared to the state-of-the-art baseline models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Shopping Queries Dataset is multilingual, containing queries in English, Japanese, and Spanish.
“The dataset is multilingual with queries in English, Japanese, and Spanish.”
From Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Search (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
Turning Clicks into Purchases: Revenue Optimization for Product Search in E-Commerce
Wu, L., Hu, D., Hong, L., & Liu, H. (2018) · The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3209978.3209993 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Search
Reddy, C. K., Màrquez, L., Valero, F., Rao, N., Zaragoza, H., Bandyopadhyay, S., Biswas, A., Xing, A., & Subbian, K. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.06588 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ahuja, A., Rao, N., Katariya, S., Subbian, K., & Reddy, C. K.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-01-20
- Pages
- 7-15
- OpenAlex
- W2998020421
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- product search, e-commerce, multi-task learning, limited training data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review