Cited by 36Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Learning Disentangled Representation for Cross-Modal Retrieval with Deep Mutual Information Estimation

Guo, Weikuo, Huang, Huaibo, Kong, Xiangwei, He, Ran·2019·Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Cross-modal retrieval has become a hot research topic in recent years for its theoretical and practical significance. This paper proposes a new technique for learning such deep visual-semantic embedding that is more effective and interpretable for cross-modal retrieval. The proposed method employs a two-stage strategy to fulfill the task. In the first stage, deep mutual information estimation is incorporated into the objective to maximize the mutual information between the input data and its embedding. In the second stage, an expelling branch is added to the network to disentangle the modality-exclusive information from the learned representations. This helps to reduce the impact of modality-exclusive information to the common subspace representation as well as improve the interpretability of the learned feature. Extensive experiments on two large-scale benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method can learn better visual-semantic embedding and achieve state-of-the-art cross-modal retrieval results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3343031.3351053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disentangled representation learning has been proposed to address modality-exclusive information by maximizing mutual information between feature embeddings from different modalities and separating modality-exclusive features [178].

    “To address this issue, disentangled representation learning has been proposed [178], which tries to maximize the mutual information between feature embeddings from different modalities and separate modality-exclusive features from them.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guo, W., Huang, H., Kong, X., & He, R.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Institute of Automation (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-15
Pages
1712-1720
OpenAlex
W2982223282
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61772111)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
cross-modal retrieval, disentangled representation learning, visual-semantic embedding, interpretable representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review