Learning Disentangled Representation for Cross-Modal Retrieval with Deep Mutual Information Estimation
Abstract
Cross-modal retrieval has become a hot research topic in recent years for its theoretical and practical significance. This paper proposes a new technique for learning such deep visual-semantic embedding that is more effective and interpretable for cross-modal retrieval. The proposed method employs a two-stage strategy to fulfill the task. In the first stage, deep mutual information estimation is incorporated into the objective to maximize the mutual information between the input data and its embedding. In the second stage, an expelling branch is added to the network to disentangle the modality-exclusive information from the learned representations. This helps to reduce the impact of modality-exclusive information to the common subspace representation as well as improve the interpretability of the learned feature. Extensive experiments on two large-scale benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method can learn better visual-semantic embedding and achieve state-of-the-art cross-modal retrieval results.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disentangled representation learning has been proposed to address modality-exclusive information by maximizing mutual information between feature embeddings from different modalities and separating modality-exclusive features [178].
“To address this issue, disentangled representation learning has been proposed [178], which tries to maximize the mutual information between feature embeddings from different modalities and separate modality-exclusive features from them.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [178]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Multimodal Convolutional Neural Networks for Matching Image and Sentence
Ma, L., Lu, Z., Shang, L., & Li, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.301 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, J., & Tao, D. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3039359 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guo, W., Huang, H., Kong, X., & He, R.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Institute of Automation (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-10-15
- Pages
- 1712-1720
- OpenAlex
- W2982223282
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61772111)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- cross-modal retrieval, disentangled representation learning, visual-semantic embedding, interpretable representations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review