Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RadHAR: Human Activity Recognition from Point Clouds Generated through a Millimeter-wave Radar

Open access
Singh, Akash Deep, Sandha, Sandeep Singh, Garcia, Luis, Srivastava, Mani·2019·Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Millimeter-wave Networks and Sensing Systems

Abstract

Accurate human activity recognition (HAR) is the key to enable emerging context-aware applications that require an understanding and identification of human behavior, e.g., monitoring disabled or elderly people who live alone. Traditionally, HAR has been implemented either through ambient sensors, e.g., cameras, or through wearable devices, e.g., a smartwatch, with an inertial measurement unit (IMU). The ambient sensing approach is typically more generalizable for different environments as this does not require every user to have a wearable device. However, utilizing a camera in privacy-sensitive areas such as a home may capture superfluous ambient information that a user may not feel comfortable sharing. Radars have been proposed as an alternative modality for coarse-grained activity recognition that captures a minimal subset of the ambient information using micro-Doppler spectrograms. However, training fine-grained, accurate activity classifiers is a challenge as low-cost millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar systems produce sparse and non-uniform point clouds. In this paper, we propose RadHAR, a framework that performs accurate HAR using sparse and non-uniform point clouds. RadHAR utilizes a sliding time window to accumulate point clouds from a mmWave radar and generate a voxelized representation that acts as input to our classifiers. We evaluate RadHAR using a low-cost, commercial, off-the-shelf radar to get sparse point clouds which are less visually compromising. We evaluate and demonstrate our system on a collected human activity dataset with 5 different activities. We compare the accuracy of various classifiers on the dataset and find that the best performing deep learning classifier achieves an accuracy of 90.47%. Our evaluation shows the efficacy of using mmWave radar for accurate HAR detection and we enumerate future research directions in this space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3349624.3356768

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Singh, A. D., Sandha, S. S., Garcia, L., & Srivastava, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Millimeter-wave Networks and Sensing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-07
Pages
51-56
OpenAlex
W2979856235
Cited by
303
References
13
FWCI
6.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RadHAR: Human Activity Recognition from Point Clouds Generated through a Millimeter-wave Radar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3349624.3356768
The paper
Singh, A. D., Sandha, S. S., Garcia, L., & Srivastava, M. (2019). RadHAR: Human Activity Recognition from Point Clouds Generated through a Millimeter-wave Radar. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Millimeter-wave Networks and Sensing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349624.3356768

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.