The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NiagaraCQ: a scalable continuous query system for Internet databases
Abstract
Continuous queries are persistent queries that allow users to receive new results when they become available. While continuous query systems can transform a passive web into an active environment, they need to be able to support millions of queries due to the scale of the Internet. No existing systems have achieved this level of scalability. NiagaraCQ addresses this problem by grouping continuous queries based on the observation that many web queries share similar structures. Grouped queries can share the common computation, tend to fit in memory and can reduce the I/O cost significantly. Furthermore, grouping on selection predicates can eliminate a large number of unnecessary query invocations. Our grouping technique is distinguished from previous group optimization approaches in the following ways. First, we use an incremental group optimization strategy with dynamic re-grouping. New queries are added to existing query groups, without having to regroup already installed queries. Second, we use a query-split scheme that requires minimal changes to a general-purpose query engine. Third, NiagaraCQ groups both change-based and timer-based queries in a uniform way. To insure that NiagaraCQ is scalable, we have also employed other techniques including incremental evaluation of continuous queries, use of both pull and push models for detecting heterogeneous data source changes, and memory caching. This paper presents the design of NiagaraCQ system and gives some experimental results on the system's performance and scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Akidau, T., Bradshaw, R., Chambers, C., Chernyak, S., Fernández-Moctezuma, R. J., Lax, R., McVeety, S., Mills, D., Perry, F., Schmidt, E., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2824032.2824076 · Cited by 750
A catalog of stream processing optimizations
Hirzel, M., Soulé, R., Schneider, S., Gedik, B., & Grimm, R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2528412 · Cited by 299
A survey on the evolution of stream processing systems
Fragkoulis, M., Carbone, P., Kalavri, V., & Katsifodimos, A. (2024) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-023-00819-8 · Cited by 207
Querying rdf streams with c-sparql
Barbieri, D. F., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Valle, E. D., & Grossniklaus, M. (2010) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/1860702.1860705 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., DeWitt, D. J., Tian, F., & Wang, Y.
- Venue
- ACM SIGMOD Record
- Published
- 2000-05-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-390
- ISSN
- 0163-5808 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132461362
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 78.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NiagaraCQ: a scalable continuous query system for Internet databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/335191.335432
- The paper
- Chen, J., DeWitt, D. J., Tian, F., & Wang, Y. (2000). NiagaraCQ: a scalable continuous query system for Internet databases. ACM SIGMOD Record. https://doi.org/10.1145/335191.335432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.