Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simba: Scaling Deep-Learning Inference with Multi-Chip-Module-Based Architecture

Shao, Yakun Sophia, Clemons, Jason, Venkatesan, Rangharajan, Zimmer, Brian, Fojtik, Matthew, Jiang, Nan, Keller, Ben, Klinefelter, Alicia, Pinckney, Nathaniel, Raina, Priyanka, Tell, Stephen G., Zhang, Yanqing, Dally, William J., Emer, Joel, Gray, C. Thomas, Khailany, Brucek, Keckler, Stephen W.·2019·Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture

Abstract

Package-level integration using multi-chip-modules (MCMs) is a promising approach for building large-scale systems. Compared to a large monolithic die, an MCM combines many smaller chiplets into a larger system, substantially reducing fabrication and design costs. Current MCMs typically only contain a handful of coarse-grained large chiplets due to the high area, performance, and energy overheads associated with inter-chiplet communication. This work investigates and quantifies the costs and benefits of using MCMs with fine-grained chiplets for deep learning inference, an application area with large compute and on-chip storage requirements. To evaluate the approach, we architected, implemented, fabricated, and tested Simba, a 36-chiplet prototype MCM system for deep-learning inference. Each chiplet achieves 4 TOPS peak performance, and the 36-chiplet MCM package achieves up to 128 TOPS and up to 6.1 TOPS/W. The MCM is configurable to support a flexible mapping of DNN layers to the distributed compute and storage units. To mitigate inter-chiplet communication overheads, we introduce three tiling optimizations that improve data locality. These optimizations achieve up to 16% speedup compared to the baseline layer mapping. Our evaluation shows that Simba can process 1988 images/s running ResNet-50 with batch size of one, delivering inference latency of 0.50 ms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3352460.3358302

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Shao, Y. S., Clemons, J., Venkatesan, R., Zimmer, B., Fojtik, M., Jiang, N., Keller, B., Klinefelter, A., Pinckney, N., Raina, P., Tell, S. G., Zhang, Y., Dally, W. J., Emer, J., Gray, C. T., Khailany, B., & Keckler, S. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-12
Pages
14-27
ISSN
1072-4451 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980104813
Cited by
406
References
58
FWCI
53.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simba: Scaling Deep-Learning Inference with Multi-Chip-Module-Based Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3352460.3358302
The paper
Shao, Y. S., Clemons, J., Venkatesan, R., Zimmer, B., Fojtik, M., Jiang, N., Keller, B., Klinefelter, A., Pinckney, N., Raina, P., Tell, S. G., Zhang, Y., Dally, W. J., Emer, J., Gray, C. T., Khailany, B., & Keckler, S. W. (2019). Simba: Scaling Deep-Learning Inference with Multi-Chip-Module-Based Architecture. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture. https://doi.org/10.1145/3352460.3358302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.