The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference
Abstract
This year, IMC received 197 submissions, 118 of which were full papers (60%) with the remaining being short submissions. Geographically, the distribution of papers included 47% from submitted by USA based first authors, 32% from Europe, 16% from Asia, and the remainder from other locations. 73% of submissions were authored by individuals from academia, while 22% of submissions came from a mix of academic and commercial authors. A remaining 5% of submitted papers had all commercial authors. Among the set of self-reported topics, security, web, measurement platforms, infrastructure and machine learning were the five most common topics for the submitted papers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online
Huang, T. (2024) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-10-21
- OpenAlex
- W2917878349
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3355369
- The paper
- Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3355369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
