Order-free Medicine Combination Prediction with Graph Convolutional Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Medicine Combination Prediction (MCP) based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) can assist doctors to prescribe medicines for complex patients. Previous studies on MCP either ignore the correlations between medicines (i.e., MCP is formulated as a binary classifcation task), or assume that there is a sequential correlation between medicines (i.e., MCP is formulated as a sequence prediction task). The latter is unreasonable because the correlations between medicines should be considered in an order-free way. Importantly, MCP must take additional medical knowledge (e.g., Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI)) into consideration to ensure the safety of medicine combinations. However, most previous methods for MCP incorporate DDI knowledge with a post-processing scheme, which might undermine the integrity of proposed medicine combinations. In this paper, we propose a graph convolutional reinforcement learning model for MCP, named Combined Order-free Medicine Prediction Network (CompNet), that addresses the issues listed above. CompNet casts the MCP task as an order-free Markov Decision Process (MDP) problem and designs a Deep Q Learning (DQL) mechanism to learn correlative and adverse interactions between medicines. Specifcally, we frst use a Dual Convolutional Neural Network (Dual-CNN) to obtain patient representations based on EHRs. Then, we introduce the medicine knowledge associated with predicted medicines to create a dynamic medicine knowledge graph, and use a Relational Graph Convolutional Network (R-GCN) to encode it. Finally, CompNet selects medicines by fusing the combination of patient information and the medicine knowledge graph. Experiments on a benchmark dataset, i.e., MIMIC-III, demonstrate that CompNet signifcantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods and improves a recently proposed model by 3.74%pt, 6.64%pt in terms of Jaccard and F1 metrics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A hierarchical knowledge graph was incorporated into learning representations in 6 of the 49 included studies.
“A hierarchical knowledge graph has been incorporated into learning representations in 6 studies [27,31–33,81,91].”
From Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
For outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality, length-of-stay, and intervention prediction, observation windows at hour level are developed.
“On the contrary, for those outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality [14,57,61,65], length-of-stay [14,83], and intervention prediction [32,55,65], observation windows at hour level are developed.”
From Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Clinical events may be correlated with each other (e.g., diagnoses lead to treatments, disease co-occurrence).
“Another challenge is that clinical events may be correlated with each other (i.e., diagnoses lead to treatments, disease co-occurrence) [32,81].”
From Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Wang, S., Ren, P., Chen, Z., Ren, Z., Ma, J., & de Rijke, M.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-11-03
- Pages
- 1623-1632
- ISSN
- 2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2983825113
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- drug-drug interactions, electronic health records, deep Q-learning, relational graph convolutional network, dual convolutional neural network, drug safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review