Cited by 13Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorDigital Marketing and Social Media

Learning to Generate Personalized Product Descriptions

Elad, Guy, Guy, Ido, Novgorodov, Slava, Kimelfeld, Benny, Radinsky, Kira·2019·Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

Abstract

Personalization plays a key role in electronic commerce, adjusting the products presented to users through search and recommendations according to their personality and tastes. Current personalization efforts focus on the adaptation of product selections, while the description of a given product remains the same regardless of the user who views it. In this work, we propose an approach to personalize product descriptions according to the personality of an individual user. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to address the problem of generating personalized product descriptions. We first learn to predict a user's personality based on past activity on an e-commerce website. Then, given a user personality, we propose an extractive summarization-based algorithm that selects the sentences to be used as part of a product description in accordance with the given personality. Our evaluation shows that user personality can be effectively learned from past e-commerce activity, while personalized descriptions can lead to a higher interest in the product and increased purchase likelihood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3357384.3357984

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains unknown how reviews can help with the unique interests of BLV users, especially providing descriptive information on product appearance.

    “Prior work towards general users investigated extracting experiences [21, 24], tips [11, 41] or snippets suitable for product descriptions [7, 25], yet it remains unknown how reviews can help with the unique interests of BLV users, especially providing descriptive information on product appearance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elad, G., Guy, I., Novgorodov, S., Kimelfeld, B., & Radinsky, K.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • eBay Research, Netanya, Israel
Venue
Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-11-03
Pages
389-398
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988981729
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
e-commerce personalization, extractive summarization, sentence selection, user activity data, purchase probability, product interest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review