Evaluating the Promise of Human-Algorithm Collaborations in Everyday Work Practices
Abstract
Human-algorithm interaction is a growing phenomenon of interest as the use of machine learning (ML) capabilities in everyday technologies becomes more commonplace. In the workplace, such developments raise questions about how people not only make sense of algorithmic actions, but also figure out ways to collaborate with tools and systems that integrate algorithmic outputs. We draw on a field study of IT infrastructure design and report on the experiences of highly-skilled IT architects with the natural language processing (NLP) capabilities in an intelligent system under development to support their solution design work. While architects were supportive of the potential of NLP to enhance their solutioning work, they faced challenges in integrating such capabilities into their existing collaborative work practices. We discuss how these findings add nuance and complexity to discourse around the future of work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In-depth understanding of in-situ interactions between workers, managers, and algorithms in standard work contexts is still relatively uncharted.
“However, in-depth understanding of the in-situ interactions between work-ers, managers, and algorithms in standard work con-texts are still relatively uncharted (Duggan et al., 2019; Jarrahi, 2019; Wolf and Blomberg, 2019).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Wolf and Blomberg, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Wolf, C., & Blomberg, J.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Wolf, Christine
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Published
- 2019-11-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- CSCW
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982773700
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- human-algorithm collaboration, natural language processing, intelligent systems, workplace technology, collaborative work practices, future of work, IT infrastructure design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review