Cited by 24Machine Learning and Data ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsNeural Networks and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Data Quality to Model Quality: An Exploratory Study on Deep Learning

He, Tianxing, Yu, Shengcheng, Wang, Ziyuan, Li, Jieqiong, Chen, Zhenyu·2019·Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware

Abstract

In the field of deep learning, people strive to construct high-quality deep neural networks (DNNs) to improve the accuracy of predicting. As well known, the quality of training data have great impacts on the quality of DNN models, since all the DNN models are obtained by training using these training data. However, there is not any reported systematic study on how the quality of training data affects the quality of DNN model. To study the relationships between data quality and model quality, we mainly consider four aspects of data quality including Skewed Classes, Sample Complexity, Label Quality, and Noisy Data in this paper. We design experiments on MNIST and Cifar-10, and attempt to find out the influences of four aspects on the quality of DNN models. Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman correlation coefficient are utilized to evaluate such influences. Experimental results show that all the four aspects of data quality have significant impacts on the quality of DNN models. It means that the decrease of data quality in these four aspects will reduce the accuracy of the DNN models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3361242.3361260

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Peter L Bartlett . 1998. The sample complexity of pattern classification with neural networks: the size of the weights is more important than the size of the network . IEEE transactions on Information Theory 44, 2 ( 1998 ), 525--536. Peter L Bartlett. 1998. The sample complexity of pattern classification with neural networks: the size of the weights is more important than the size of the network. IEEE transactions on Information Theory 44, 2 (1998), 525--536.
  2. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.580 · DOI
  3. Min Lin , Qiang Chen , and Shuicheng Yan . 2013. Network in network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4400 ( 2013 ). Min Lin, Qiang Chen, and Shuicheng Yan. 2013. Network in network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4400 (2013). · arXiv
  4. John C Platt. 1999. Using analytic QP and sparseness to speed training of support vector machines. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 557--563. John C Platt. 1999. Using analytic QP and sparseness to speed training of support vector machines. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 557--563.
  5. Weijun Shen , Jun Wan , and Zhenyu Chen . 2018 . MuNN: Mutation Analysis of Neural Networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C). IEEE, 108--115 . Weijun Shen, Jun Wan, and Zhenyu Chen. 2018. MuNN: Mutation Analysis of Neural Networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C). IEEE, 108--115.
  6. Dong Wang , Ziyuan Wang , Chunrong Fang , Yanshan Chen , and Zhenyu Chen . 2019 . DeepPath: Path-Driven Testing Criteria for Deep Neural Networks. In 2019 IEEE International Conference On Artificial Intelligence Testing (AITest). IEEE, 119--120 . Dong Wang, Ziyuan Wang, Chunrong Fang, Yanshan Chen, and Zhenyu Chen. 2019. DeepPath: Path-Driven Testing Criteria for Deep Neural Networks. In 2019 IEEE International Conference On Artificial Intelligence Testing (AITest). IEEE, 119--120.
  7. Shixian Wen and Laurent Itti . 2018. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting problem by weight consolidation and long-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.07441 ( 2018 ). Shixian Wen and Laurent Itti. 2018. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting problem by weight consolidation and long-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.07441 (2018). · arXiv
  8. Xufan Zhang , Ziyue Yin , Yang Feng , Qingkai Shi , Jia Liu , and Zhenyu Chen . 2019. NeuralVis: Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00690 ( 2019 ). Xufan Zhang, Ziyue Yin, Yang Feng, Qingkai Shi, Jia Liu, and Zhenyu Chen. 2019. NeuralVis: Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00690 (2019). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, T., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Li, J., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-28
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2981813488
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
data quality, model quality, deep neural network, class skew, sample complexity, label noise, noisy data, training data quality, model accuracy, MNIST, CIFAR-10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review