Cited by 68Formal Methods in VerificationSafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Case study: verifying the safety of an autonomous racing car with a neural network controller

Ivanov, Radoslav, Carpenter, Taylor J., Weimer, James, Alur, Rajeev, Pappas, George J., Lee, Insup·2020·Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control

Abstract

This paper describes a verification case study on an autonomous racing car with a neural network (NN) controller. Although several verification approaches have been recently proposed, they have only been evaluated on low-dimensional systems or systems with constrained environments. To explore the limits of existing approaches, we present a challenging benchmark in which the NN takes raw LiDAR measurements as input and outputs steering for the car. We train a dozen NNs using reinforcement learning (RL) and show that the state of the art in verification can handle systems with around 40 LiDAR rays. Furthermore, we perform real experiments to investigate the benefits and limitations of verification with respect to the sim2real gap, i.e., the difference between a system's modeled and real performance. We identify cases, similar to the modeled environment, in which verification is strongly correlated with safe behavior. Finally, we illustrate LiDAR fault patterns that can be used to develop robust and safe RL algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3365365.3382216

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual world models have been created in settings where the operating environment is known or controllable, such as controllers in airplanes and self-driving cars, and are commonly used in scientific research including epidemic simulators and particle physics simulators.

    “This has been done in settings where the operating environment is known or controllable, for e.g.controllers in airplanes (Garion et al., 2022;Fremont et al., 2020a) and self-driving cars (Ivanov et al., 2020;Fremont et al., 2020b).Such models are also commonly used in scientific research, including epidemic simulators (Broeck et al., 2011) and particle physics simulators (Baydin et al., 2019b).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanov, R., Carpenter, T. J., Weimer, J., Alur, R., Pappas, G. J., & Lee, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-22
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W3021958118
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11
FWCI
11.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Hybrid Systems: computation and control (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-18-C-0090)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
autonomous racing car, neural network controller, verification, LiDAR, steering control, reinforcement learning, sim-to-real gap, safety verification, fault patterns, robustness, benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review