Cited by 99Software System Performance and ReliabilityCloud Computing and Resource ManagementDistributed systems and fault tolerance

Towards intelligent incident management: why we need it and how we make it

Chen, Zhuangbin, Kang, Yu, Li, Liqun, Zhang, Xu, Zhang, Hongyu, Xu, Hui, Zhou, Yangfan, Yang, Li +9 more·2020·Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

Abstract

The management of cloud service incidents (unplanned interruptions or outages of a service/product) greatly affects customer satisfaction and business revenue. After years of efforts, cloud enterprises are able to solve most incidents automatically and timely. However, in practice, we still observe critical service incidents that occurred in an unexpected manner and orchestrated diagnosis workflow failed to mitigate them. In order to accelerate the understanding of unprecedented incidents and provide actionable recommendations, modern incident management system employs the strategy of AIOps (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations). In this paper, to provide a broad view of industrial incident management and understand the modern incident management system, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study spanning over two years of incident management practices at Microsoft. Particularly, we identify two critical challenges (namely, incomplete service/resource dependencies and imprecise resource health assessment) and investigate the underlying reasons from the perspective of cloud system design and operations. We also present IcM BRAIN, our AIOps framework towards intelligent incident management, and show its practical benefits conveyed to the cloud services of Microsoft.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3368089.3417055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Z., Kang, Y., Li, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Xu, H., Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Sun, J., Xu, Z., Dang, Y., Gao, F., Zhao, P., Qiao, B., Lin, Q., Zhang, D., & Lyu, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-11-08
Pages
1487-1497
OpenAlex
W3047881323
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8
FWCI
9.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
incident management, AIOps, incident diagnosis, IT operations automation, Microsoft cloud services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review