The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A replicated assessment and comparison of common software cost modeling techniques
Open accessAbstract
Delivering a software product on time, within budget, and to an agreed level of quality is a critical concern for many software organizations. Underestimating software costs can have detrimental effects on the quality of the delivered software and thus on a company's business reputation and competitiveness. On the other hand, overestimation of software cost can result in missed opportunities to funds in other projects. In response to industry demand, a myriad of estimation techniques has been proposed during the last three decades. In order to assess the suitability of a technique from a diverse selection, its performance and relative merits must be compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models
Wen, J., Li, S., Lin, Z., Hu, Y., & Huang, C. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.09.002 · Cited by 526
Data mining techniques for software effort estimation: a comparative study
Dejaeger, K., Verbeke, W., Martens, D., & Baesens, B. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2011.55 · Cited by 224
An empirical analysis of data preprocessing for machine learning-based software cost estimation
Huang, J., Li, Y.-F., & Xie, M. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.07.004 · Cited by 223
Guidelines for the Search Strategy to Update Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
Wohlin, C., Mendes, E., Felizardo, K. R., & Kalinowski, M. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106366 · Cited by 147
The role and value of replication in empirical software engineering results
Shepperd, M., Ajienka, N., & Counsell, S. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.006 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Briand, L. C., Langley, T., & Wieczorek, I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '00
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 377-386
- ISSN
- 0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161074247
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A replicated assessment and comparison of common software cost modeling techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/337180.337223
- The paper
- Briand, L. C., Langley, T., & Wieczorek, I. (2000). A replicated assessment and comparison of common software cost modeling techniques. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '00. https://doi.org/10.1145/337180.337223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
