The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DLFix: context-based code transformation learning for automated program repair
Abstract
Automated Program Repair (APR) is very useful in helping developers in the process of software development and maintenance. Despite recent advances in deep learning (DL), the DL-based APR approaches still have limitations in learning bug-fixing code changes and the context of the surrounding source code of the bug-fixing code changes. These limitations lead to incorrect fixing locations or fixes. In this paper, we introduce DLFix, a two-tier DL model that treats APR as code transformation learning from the prior bug fixes and the surrounding code contexts of the fixes. The first layer is a tree-based RNN model that learns the contexts of bug fixes and its result is used as an additional weighting input for the second layer designed to learn the bug-fixing code transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks
See, A., Liu, P. J., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1099 · Cited by 3,775
Is the cure worse than the disease? overfitting in automated program repair
Smith, E. K., Barr, E. T., Le Goues, C., & Brun, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2786805.2786825 · Cited by 323
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 2019. The GitHub Repository for This Study. https://github.com/ICSE-2019-AUTOFIX/ICSE-2019-AUTOFIX
- 10.1109/PRDC.2006.18 · DOI · Paper page
- Denny Britz, Anna Goldie, Minh-Thang Luong, and Quoc Le. 2017. Massive exploration of neural machine translation architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03906 (2017). · arXiv
- Saikat Chakraborty, Miltiadis Allamanis, and Baishakhi Ray. 2018. CODIT: Code Editing with Tree-Based Neural Machine Translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00314 (2018). · arXiv
- 10.1109/TSE.2019.2940179 · DOI · Paper page
- Yann Le Cun, Conrad C. Galland, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 1989. GEMINI: Gradient Estimation through Matrix Inversion after Noise Injection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 141--148.
- 10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSE.2011.104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10742 · DOI · Paper page
- Hideaki Hata, Emad Shihab, and Graham Neubig. 2018. Learning to generate corrective patches using neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.07170 (2018). · arXiv
- 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606626 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606626 · DOI · Paper page
- Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014). · arXiv
- Anil Koyuncu, Kui Liu, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Dongsun Kim, Jacques Klein, Martin Monperrus, and Yves Le Traon. 2018. Fixminer: Mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01791 (2018). · arXiv
- 10.1109/SANER.2016.76 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3360588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/APSEC.2018.00085 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICST.2019.00020 · DOI
- 10.1109/SANER2019.8667970 · doi:10.1109/saner2019.8667970
- 10.1145/3293882.3330577 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3106237.3106253 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2786805.2786811 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2837614.2837617 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2931037.2948705 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606623 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1806799.1806847 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2017.62 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2568225.2568254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2393596.2393659 · DOI
- Ripon K. Saha, Yingjun Lyu, Wing Lam, Hiroaki Yoshida, and Mukul R. Prasad. 2018. Bugs.jar: A Large-Scale, Diverse Dataset of Real-World Java Bugs. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). 10--13.
- 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115675 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00020 · DOI
- Kai Sheng Tai, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. 2015. Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.00075 (2015). · arXiv
- 10.1145/2950290.2950295 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3238147.3240732 · DOI
- 10.1145/3238147.3238206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3180155.3180233 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/SANER.2019.8668043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2970276.2970326 · DOI · Paper page
- Qi Xin and Steven P. Reiss. 2017. Leveraging Syntax-Related Code for Automated Program Repair. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA) (ASE 2017). IEEE Press, 660--670.
- 10.1109/ICSE.2017.45 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Models
Xia, C. S., Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00129 · Cited by 433
Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language Models
Fan, Z., Gao, X., Mirchev, M., Roychoudhury, A., & Tan, S. H. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00128 · Cited by 256
InferFix: End-to-End Program Repair with LLMs
Jin, M., Shahriar, S., Tufano, M., Shi, X., Lu, S., Sundaresan, N., & Svyatkovskiy, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3613892 · Cited by 191
Retrieval-Based Prompt Selection for Code-Related Few-Shot Learning
Nashid, N., Sintaha, M., & Mesbah, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00205 · Cited by 178
Wei, Y., Xia, C. S., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616271 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Wang, S., & Nguyen, T. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-06-27
- Pages
- 602-614
- OpenAlex
- W3089621332
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- US National Science foundation (NSF) (CCF-1723215, CCF-1723432, TWC-1723198, CCF-1518897, CCF-1513263)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DLFix: context-based code transformation learning for automated program repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3377811.3380345
- The paper
- Li, Y., Wang, S., & Nguyen, T. N. (2020). DLFix: context-based code transformation learning for automated program repair. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.