Cited by 14Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpam and Phishing Detection

Automated Cyberbullying Detection in Social Media Using an SVM Activated Stacked Convolution LSTM Network

Buan, Thor Aleksander, Ramachandra, Raghavendra·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis

Abstract

Cyberbullying is becoming a huge problem on social media platforms. New statistics shows that more than a fourth of Norwegiankids report that they have been cyberbullied once or more duringthe last year. In the most recent years, it has become popularto utilize Neural Networks in order to automate the detection ofcyberbullying. These Neural Networks are often based on using Long-Short-Term-Memory layers solely or in combination withother types of layers. In this thesis we present a new Neural Networkdesign that can be used to detect traces of cyberbullying intextual media. The design is based on existing designs that combinesthe power of Convolutional layers with Long-Short-Term-Memorylayers. In addition, our design features the usage of stacked corelayers, which our research shows to increases the performance ofthe Neural Network. The design also features a new kind of activationmechanism, which is referred to as "Support-Vector-Machinelike activation". The "SupportVector-Machine like activation" isachieved by applying L2 weight regularization and utilizing a linearactivation function in the activation layer together with using aHinge loss function. Our experiments show that both the stackingof the layers and the "Support-Vector-Machine like activation"increasesthe performance of the Neural Network over traditionalState-Of-The-Art designs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3388142.3388147

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning models outperform traditional machine learning algorithms in identifying cyberbullying.

    “However, current research demonstrates that deep learning surpasses traditional machine learning algorithms in identifying cyberbullying for several reasons, including handling extensive data, efficiently classifying text and images, extracting features automatically through hidden layers, and many others.”

    From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 14

Authors
Buan, T. A., & Ramachandra, R.
Affiliations
  • Sopra (France) (FR)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-03-09
Pages
170-174
OpenAlex
W3020831121
Cited by
14
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis (ICCDA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, social media, convolutional LSTM, hinge loss, linear activation function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review