The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Data Poisoning Attacks against Differentially Private Recommender Systems
Abstract
Recommender systems based on collaborative filtering are highly vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where a determined attacker injects fake users with false user-item feedback, with an objective to either corrupt the recommender system or promote/demote a target set of items. Recently, differential privacy was explored as a defense technique against data poisoning attacks in the typical machine learning setting. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of differential privacy against such attacks on matrix factorization based collaborative filtering systems. Concretely, we conduct extensive experiments for evaluating robustness to injection of malicious user profiles by simulating common types of shilling attacks on real-world data and comparing the predictions of typical matrix factorization with differentially private matrix factorization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Typically, common strategies to defend against such attacks in the RS include anomaly detection, clustering, and differential privacy [107, 109, 112, 113].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- C.Dwork and A.Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science(2014). C.Dwork and A.Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science(2014). · DOI · Paper page
- F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan. 2015. The Movie Lens Datasets: History and Context. In ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS'15). F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan. 2015. The Movie Lens Datasets: History and Context. In ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS'15).
- N. Hurley , Z. Cheng , and M. Zhang . 2009. Statistical attack detection . In ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09) . N. Hurley, Z. Cheng, and M. Zhang. 2009. Statistical attack detection. In ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09).
- B. Li Y. Wang A. Singh and Y. Vorobeychik. 2016. Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filtering. In NeurIPS'16. B. Li Y. Wang A. Singh and Y. Vorobeychik. 2016. Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filtering. In NeurIPS'16.
- Z. Liu Y.X. Wang and A. Smola. 2015. Fast Differentially Private Matrix Factorization. In RecSys'15. Z. Liu Y.X. Wang and A. Smola. 2015. Fast Differentially Private Matrix Factorization. In RecSys'15. · DOI
- Y. Ma , X. Zhu , and J. Hsu. 201 9. Data Poisoning against Differentially-Private Learners: Attacks and Defenses. In IJCAI'19. Y. Ma, X. Zhu, and J. Hsu. 2019. Data Poisoning against Differentially-Private Learners: Attacks and Defenses. In IJCAI'19.
- C. E. Seminario and D. C. Wilson . 2014. Attacking item-based recommender systems with power items . In ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys'14) . C. E. Seminario and D. C. Wilson. 2014. Attacking item-based recommender systems with power items. In ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys'14).
- J. Steinhardt , P.W. Koh , and P. Liang . 2017 . Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS'17) . J. Steinhardt, P.W. Koh, and P. Liang. 2017. Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS'17).
- Y. X. Wang , S. Fienberg , and A. Smola . 2015. Privacy for free: Posterior sampling and stochastic gradient monte carlo . In ICML'15 . Y. X. Wang, S. Fienberg, and A. Smola. 2015. Privacy for free: Posterior sampling and stochastic gradient monte carlo. In ICML'15.
- Z. Yang and Z. Cai. 2017. Detecting abnormal profiles in collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. Z. Yang and Z. Cai. 2017. Detecting abnormal profiles in collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. · DOI
- Z. Zhang and S. R. Kulkarni . 2013. Graph-based detection of shilling attacks in recommender systems . In IEEE Workshop Machine Learning for Signal Processing. Z. Zhang and S. R. Kulkarni. 2013. Graph-based detection of shilling attacks in recommender systems. In IEEE Workshop Machine Learning for Signal Processing.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses
Goldblum, M., Tsipras, D., Xie, C., Chen, X., Schwarzschild, A., Song, D., Madry, A., Li, B., & Goldstein, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3162397 · Cited by 362
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wadhwa, S., Agrawal, S., Chaudhari, H., Sharma, D., & Achan, K.
- Affiliations
- Walmart (United States) (US)
- Walmart Labs, Bangalore, India
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Walmart Labs, Sunnyvale, CA, India
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-07-25
- Pages
- 1617-1620
- OpenAlex
- W3035454601
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- data poisoning, differential privacy, recommender systems, collaborative filtering, shilling attacks, matrix factorization, robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review