Cited by 28Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Weakly Supervised Multi-Task Representation Learning for Human Activity Analysis Using Wearables

Open access
Sheng, Taoran, Huber, Manfred·2020·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Sensor data streams from wearable devices and smart environments are widely studied in areas like human activity recognition (HAR), person identification, or health monitoring. However, most of the previous works in activity and sensor stream analysis have been focusing on one aspect of the data, e.g. only recognizing the type of the activity or only identifying the person who performed the activity. We instead propose an approach that uses a weakly supervised multi-output siamese network that learns to map the data into multiple representation spaces, where each representation space focuses on one aspect of the data. The representation vectors of the data samples are positioned in the space such that the data with the same semantic meaning in that aspect are closely located to each other. Therefore, as demonstrated with a set of experiments, the trained model can provide metrics for clustering data based on multiple aspects, allowing it to address multiple tasks simultaneously and even to outperform single task supervised methods in many situations. In addition, further experiments are presented that in more detail analyze the effect of the architecture and of using multiple tasks within this framework, that investigate the scalability of the model to include additional tasks, and that demonstrate the ability of the framework to combine data for which only partial relationship information with respect to the target tasks is available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3397330

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Mohammad Abu Alsheikh, Ahmed Selim, Dusit Niyato, Linda Doyle, Shaowei Lin, and Hwee Pink Tan. 2016. Deep activity recognition models with triaxial accelerometers. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. WS-16-01 -WS-16-15. AI Access Foundation, United States, 8-13.
  2. Oresti Banos, Rafael Garcia, Juan A. Holgado-Terriza, Miguel Damas, Hector Pomares, Ignacio Rojas, Alejandro Saez, and Claudia Villalonga. 2014. mHealthDroid: A Novel Framework for Agile Development of Mobile Health Applications. In Ambient Assisted Living and Daily Activities, Leandro Pecchia, Liming Luke Chen, Chris Nugent, and José Bravo (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 91-98.
  3. Klas Berggren. 2018. Human Activity Recognition using Deep Learning and Sensor Fusion. Master's thesis. Lund University.
  4. Jane Bromley, Isabelle Guyon, Yann LeCun, Eduard Säckinger, and Roopak Shah. 1993. Signature Verification Using a "Siamese" Time Delay Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'93).
  5. Nils Y. Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Plötz. 2016. Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'16). AAAI Press, 1533-1540. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3060832.3060835
  6. Javier Hernandez, Daniel J. McDuff, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2015. BioInsights: Extracting personal data from "Still" wearable motion sensors.. In BSN. IEEE, 1-6.
  7. A. Kale, N. Cuntoor, B. Yegnanarayana, A. N. Rajagopalan, and R. Chellappa. 2003. Gait Analysis for Human Identification. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Audio-and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA'03). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 706-714. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1762222.1762314
  8. Herman Kamper, Weiran Wang, and Karen Livescu. 2015. Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side information. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (2015), 4950-4954.
  9. Jonas Mueller and Aditya Thyagarajan. 2016. Siamese Recurrent Architectures for Learning Sentence Similarity. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'16). AAAI Press, 2786-2792. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3016100.3016291
  10. Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras, Andrew Ilyas, and Aleksander Madry. 2018. How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 2483-2493. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7515-how-does-batch-normalization-help-optimization.pdf
  11. Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 (2008), 2579-2605. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html
  12. Neil Zeghidour, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2016. Joint Learning of Speaker and Phonetic Similarities with Siamese Networks. In INTERSPEECH.
  13. M. Zeng, L. T. Nguyen, B. Yu, O. J. Mengshoel, J. Zhu, P. Wu, and J. Zhang. 2014. Convolutional Neural Networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services. 197-205.
  14. Xiang Zhang, Junbo Zhao, and Yann LeCun. 2015. Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classification. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems -Volume 1 (NIPS'15). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 649-657. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2969239.2969312

Authors
Sheng, T., & Huber, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2020-06-15
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
1-18
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034583105
Cited by
28
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, weakly supervised learning, multi-task learning, Siamese network, representation learning, sensor data streams, health monitoring, personal identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review