The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AyaTEC: Building a Reusable Verse-Based Test Collection for Arabic Question Answering on the Holy Qur’an
Abstract
The absence of publicly available reusable test collections for Arabic question answering on the Holy Qur’an has impeded the possibility of fairly comparing the performance of systems in that domain. In this article, we introduce AyaTEC , a reusable test collection for verse-based question answering on the Holy Qur’an, which serves as a common experimental testbed for this task. AyaTEC includes 207 questions (with their corresponding 1,762 answers) covering 11 topic categories of the Holy Qur’an that target the information needs of both curious and skeptical users. To the best of our effort, the answers to the questions (each represented as a sequence of verses) in AyaTEC were exhaustive—that is, all qur’anic verses that directly answered the questions were exhaustively extracted and annotated. To facilitate the use of AyaTEC in evaluating the systems designed for that task, we propose several evaluation measures to support the different types of questions and the nature of verse-based answers while integrating the concept of partial matching of answers in the evaluation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.3115/v1/W14-3607 · DOI · Paper page
- Alrabiah M., 2014, KSUCCA: A key to exploring Arabic historical linguistics, International Journal of Computational Linguistics, 5, 27
- Atwell Eric, 2010, Proceedings of the Conference on Grand Challenges in Computing Research (GCCR’10)
- 10.1007/s10579-019-09460-w · DOI
- Dang Hoa Trang, 2007, Overview of the TREC 2007 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’07)
- Dang Hoa Trang, 2006, Overview of the TREC 2006 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 14th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’06)
- 10.1007/s13369-016-2251-y · DOI
- Hamdelsayed M. A., 2016, Islamic applications of automatic question-answering, Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 17, 51
- Hamdelsayed Mohamed Adany, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Islamic Applications in Computer Science and Technologies (IMAN’16)
- Hamdelsayed Mohamed Adany, 2017, Islamic application of question answering systems: Comparative study, Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 7, 29
- 10.3844/jcssp.2016.169.177 · DOI
- Hamoud Bothaina, 2016, Using an Islamic question and answer knowledge base to answer questions about the Holy Quran, International Journal on Islamic Applications in Computer Science And Technology, 4, 20
- Hamoud Bothaina, 2017, Evaluation corpus for restricted-domain question-answering systems for the Holy Quran, International Journal of Science and Research, 6, 1133
- Holes Clive, 2004, Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties
- 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/1133031.1133035 · DOI
- Rad Hamed Zakeri, 2018, Lexical scoring system of lexical chain for quranic document retrieval. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 18, 2
- 10.18653/v1/D16-1264 · DOI · Paper page
- Abdul-Baquee, Proceedings of the 8th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12)
- Shmeisani H., Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Islamic Applications in Computer Science and Technology. 1--8.
- 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257 · DOI · Paper page
- Voorhees Ellen M., 2003, Overview of the TREC 2003 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 11th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’03)
- Voorhees Ellen M., 2004, Overview of the TREC 2004 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 12th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’04)
- Ellen, Overview of the TREC 2005 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 13th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’05)
- Ellen, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM
- 10.19026/rjaset.6.3457 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions
Atif, F., Askarbekuly, N., Darwish, K., & Choudhury, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v8i1.36543 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Malhas, R., & Elsayed, T.
- Affiliations
- Qatar University (QA)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
- Published
- 2020-10-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 2375-4699 (ISSN-L)
- 2375-4702
- OpenAlex
- W3090081112
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing (publishedVersion)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Qatar University through (QUST-1-CENG-2018-24)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- Arabic question answering, test collections, evaluation metrics, partial matching, Arabic information retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review