Cited by 31Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningRecommender Systems and TechniquesPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study of Defensive Methods to Protect Visual Recommendation Against Adversarial Manipulation of Images

Anelli, Vito Walter, Deldjoo, Yashar, Di Noia, Tommaso, Malitesta, Daniele, Merra, Felice Antonio·2021·Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Visual-based recommender systems (VRSs) enhance recommendation performance by integrating users' feedback with the visual features of items' images. Recently, human-imperceptible image perturbations, defined adversarial samples, have been shown capable of altering the VRSs performance, for example, by pushing (promoting) or nuking (demoting) specific categories of products. One of the most effective adversarial defense methods is adversarial training (AT), which enhances the robustness of the model by incorporating adversarial samples into the training process and minimizing an adversarial risk. The AT effectiveness has been verified on defending DNNs in supervised learning tasks such as image classification. However, the extent to which AT can protect deep VRSs, against adversarial perturbation of images remains mostly under-investigated. This work focuses on the defensive side of VRSs and provides general insights that could be further exploited to broaden the frontier in the field. First, we introduce a suite of adversarial attacks against DNNs on top of VRSs, and defense strategies to counteract them. Next, we present an evaluation framework, named Visual Adversarial Recommender (VAR), to empirically investigate the performance of defended or undefended DNNs in various visually-aware item recommendation tasks. The results of large-scale experiments indicate alarming risks in protecting a VRS through the DNN robustification. Source code and data are available at https://github.com/sisinflab/Visual-Adversarial-Recommendation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3404835.3462848

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Vito Walter Anelli, Alejandro Bellogin, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, and Felice Antonio Merra. 2021. MSAP: Multi-Step Adversarial Perturbations on Recommender Systems Embeddings. In FLAIRS.
  2. Vito Walter Anelli, Tommaso Di Noia, Daniele Malitesta, and Felice Antonio Merra. 2020. Assessing Perceptual and Recommendation Mutation of Adversarially-Poisoned Visual Recommenders (short paper). In DP@AI*IA (CEUR Workshop Proceedings). CEUR-WS.org.
  3. Runa Bhaumik, Chad Williams, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2006. Securing collaborative filtering against malicious attacks through anomaly detection. In ITWP 2006.
  4. Yuanjiang Cao Xiaocong Chen Lina Yao Xianzhi Wang and Wei Emma Zhang. 2020. Adversarial Attacks and Detection on Reinforcement Learning-Based Interactive Recommender Systems. In SIGIR. ACM 1669--1672.
  5. Nicholas Carlini, Anish Athalye, Nicolas Papernot, Wieland Brendel, Jonas Rauber, Dimitris Tsipras, Ian J. Goodfellow, Aleksander Madry, and Alexey Kurakin. 2019. On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness. CoRR 2019 (2019).
  6. Nicholas Carlini and David A. Wagner. 2016. Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examples. CoRR 2016 (2016).
  7. Nicholas Carlini and David A. Wagner. 2017a. Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methods. In AISec@CCS 2017.
  8. Nicholas Carlini and David A. Wagner. 2017b. Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks. In SP 2017.
  9. 10.1145/3298689.3346987 · DOI
  10. Jingyuan Chen Hanwang Zhang Xiangnan He Liqiang Nie Wei Liu and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Attentive Collaborative Filtering: Multimedia Recommendation with Item- and Component-Level Attention. In SIGIR. ACM. · DOI
  11. Xiaoya Chong, Qing Li, Howard Leung, Qianhui Men, and Xianjin Chao. 2020. Hierarchical Visual-aware Minimax Ranking Based on Co-purchase Data for Personalized Recommendation. In WWW 2020.
  12. Rami Cohen, Oren Sar Shalom, Dietmar Jannach, and Amihood Amir. 2021. A Black-Box Attack Model for Visually-Aware Recommender Systems., 94--102 pages.
  13. Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, and Felice Antonio Merra. 2021. A survey on adversarial recommender systems: from attack/defense strategies to generative adversarial networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) (2021).
  14. Yashar Deldjoo Tommaso Di Noia Eugenio Di Sciascio and Felice Antonio Merra. 2020 a. How Dataset Characteristics Affect the Robustness of Collaborative Recommendation Models. In SIGIR. ACM 951--960. · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3407190 · DOI
  16. Tommaso Di Noia, Daniele Malitesta, and Felice Antonio Merra. 2020. TAaMR: Targeted Adversarial Attack against Multimedia Recommender Systems. In DSN--DSML 2020.
  17. 10.1145/3336191.3371789 · DOI
  18. Alexey Kurakand Ian J. Goodfellow and Samy Bengio. 2017. Adversarial examples the physical world. In ICLR 2017.
  19. Ian J. Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. 2015. Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples. In ICLR 2015.
  20. 10.1145/3336191.3372192 · DOI
  21. Chuan Guo, Mayank Rana, Moustapha Cissé, and Laurens van der Maaten. 2018. Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformations. In ICLR 2018.
  22. Ruining He and Julian J. McAuley. 2016a. Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering. In WWW 2016.
  23. Ruining He and Julian J. McAuley. 2016b. VBPR: Visual Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In AAAI 2016.
  24. Xiangnan He, Zhankui He, Xiaoyu Du, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2018. Adversarial Personalized Ranking for Recommendation. In SIGIR 2018.
  25. G. Hinton L. Deng D. Yu G. E. Dahl A. Mohamed N. Jaitly A. Senior V. Vanhoucke P. Nguyen T. N. Sainath and B. Kingsbury. 2012. Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling Speech Recognition: The Shared Views of Four Research Groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wang-Cheng Kang, Chen Fang, Zhaowen Wang, and Julian J. McAuley. [n.d.]. Visually-Aware Fashion Recommendation and Design with Generative Image Models. In ICDM 2017.
  27. Saeid Balaneshin Kordan and Alexander Kotov. 2018. Deep Neural Architecture for Multi-Modal Retrieval based on Joint Embedding Space for Text and Images. In WSDM 2018.
  28. 10.1109/MC.2009.263 · DOI
  29. Maciej Kula. 2015. Metadata Embeddings for User and Item Cold-start Recommendations. In CBRecSys@RecSys 2015.
  30. Shyong K. Lam and John Riedl. 2004. Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. In WWW 2004.
  31. Yang Liu Xianzhuo Xia Liang Chen Xiangnan He Carl Yang and Zibin Zheng. 2020. Certifiable Robustness to Discrete Adversarial Perturbations for Factorization Machines. In SIGIR. ACM 419--428. · DOI
  32. Aleksander Madry, Aleksandar Makelov, Ludwig Schmidt, Dimitris Tsipras, and Adrian Vladu. 2018. Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks. In ICLR 2018.
  33. Jarana Manotumruksa and Emine Yilmaz. 2020. Sequential-based Adversarial Optimisation for Personalised Top-N Item Recommendation. In SIGIR. ACM. · DOI
  34. Julian J. McAuley, Christopher Targett, Qinfeng Shi, and Anton van den Hengel. 2015. Image-Based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutes. In SIGIR 2015.
  35. Wei Niu, James Caverlee, and Haokai Lu. 2018. Neural Personalized Ranking for Image Recommendation. In WSDM 2018.
  36. Michael P. O'Mahony, Neil J. Hurley, Nicholas Kushmerick, and Guenole C. M. Silvestre. 2004. Collaborative recommendation: A robustness analysis. ACM Trans. Internet Techn. (2004).
  37. Nicolas Papernot Fartash Faghri Nicholas Carlini Ian Goodfellow Reuben Feinman Alexey Kurakand Cihang Xie Yash Sharma Tom Brown Aurko Roy Alexander Matyasko Vahid Behzadan Karen Hambardzumyan Zhishuai Zhang Yi-LJuang Zhi Li Ryan Sheatsley Abhibhav Garg Jonathan Uesato Willi Gierke Yinpeng Dong David Berthelot Paul Hendricks Jonas Rauber and Rujun Long. 2018. Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Library. Corr 2018 (2018).
  38. 10.1109/SP.2016.41 · DOI
  39. Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross B. Girshick, and Jian Sun. 2015. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. In NeurIPS 2015.
  40. Steffen Rendle. 2010. Factorization Machines. In ICDM 2010.
  41. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 209. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In UAI 2009.
  42. Steffen Rendle Christoph Freudenthaler and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2010. Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In WWW. ACM. · DOI
  43. Francesco Ricci Lior Rokach and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). 2015. Recommender Systems Handbook .Springer. · DOI
  44. Ali Shafahi, Mahyar Najibi, AmGhiasi, Zheng Xu, John P. Dickerson, Christoph Studer, Larry S. Davis, GavTaylor, and Tom Goldstein. 2019. Adversarial training for free!. In NeurIPS 2019.
  45. Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian J. Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. 2014. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In ICLR 2014.
  46. 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2893638 · DOI
  47. Xianfeng Tang, Yandong Li, Yiwei Sun, Huaxiu Yao, Prasenjit Mitra, and Suhang Wang. 2020 b. Transferring Robustness for Graph Neural Network Against Poisoning Attacks. In WSDM 2020.
  48. Saú l Vargas. 2014. Novelty and diversity enhancement and evaluation in recommender systems and information retrieval. In SIGIR. ACM 1281. · DOI
  49. Zhijing Wu, Yiqun Liu, Qianfan Zhang, Kailu Wu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. The Influence of Image Search Intents on User Behavior and Satisfaction. In WSDM 2019.
  50. Ruiping Yin, Kan Li, Jie Lu, and Guangquan Zhang. 2019. Enhancing Fashion Recommendation with Visual Compatibility Relationship. In WWW 2019.
  51. Wenhui Yu, Huidi Zhang, Xiangnan He, Xu Chen, Li Xiong, and Zheng Qin. 2018. Aesthetic-based Clothing Recommendation. In WWW 2018, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Fabien L. Gandon, Mounia Lalmas, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis (Eds.).
  52. Feng Yuan Lina Yao and Boualem Benatallah. 2019 b. Adversarial Collaborative Neural Network for Robust Recommendation. In SIGIR. ACM 1065--1068. · DOI
  53. 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2886017 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1145/2619239.2631434 · DOI
  55. YZhang and James Caverlee. 2019. Instagrammers, Fashionistas, and Me: Recurrent Fashion Recommendation with Implicit Visual Influence. In CIKM 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Anelli, V. W., Deldjoo, Y., Di Noia, T., Malitesta, D., & Merra, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
  • Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Venue
Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-07-11
Pages
1094-1103
OpenAlex
W3154484426
Cited by
31
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7
FWCI
3.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
visual recommendation, adversarial attacks, adversarial training, adversarial defense, deep neural network robustness, image perturbation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of Defensive Methods to Protect Visual Recommendation Against Adversarial Manipulation of Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3404835.3462848
The paper
Anelli, V. W., Deldjoo, Y., Di Noia, T., Malitesta, D., & Merra, F. A. (2021). A Study of Defensive Methods to Protect Visual Recommendation Against Adversarial Manipulation of Images. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3462848