Cited by 443Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendation

Open access
Zhang, Yang, Feng, Fuli, He, Xiangnan, Wei, Tianxin, Song, Chonggang, Ling, Guohui, Zhang, Yongdong·2021·Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Recommender system usually faces popularity bias issues: from the data perspective, items exhibit uneven (usually long-tail) distribution on the interaction frequency; from the method perspective, collaborative filtering methods are prone to amplify the bias by over-recommending popular items. It is undoubtedly critical to consider popularity bias in recommender systems, and existing work mainly eliminates the bias effect with propensity-based unbiased learning or causal embeddings. However, we argue that not all biases in the data are bad, \ie some items demonstrate higher popularity because of their better intrinsic quality. Blindly pursuing unbiased learning may remove the beneficial patterns in the data, degrading the recommendation accuracy and user satisfaction. This work studies an unexplored problem in recommendation --- how to leverage popularity bias to improve the recommendation accuracy. The key lies in two aspects: how to remove the bad impact of popularity bias during training, and how to inject the desired popularity bias in the inference stage that generates top-K recommendations. This questions the causal mechanism of the recommendation generation process. Along this line, we find that item popularity plays the role ofconfounder between the exposed items and the observed interactions, causing the bad effect of bias amplification. To achieve our goal, we propose a new training and inference paradigm for recommendation named Popularity-bias Deconfounding and Adjusting (PDA). It removes the confounding popularity bias in model training and adjusts the recommendation score with desired popularity bias via causal intervention. We demonstrate the new paradigm on the latent factor model and perform extensive experiments on three real-world datasets from Kwai, Douban, and Tencent. Empirical studies validate that the deconfounded training is helpful to discover user real interests and the inference adjustment with popularity bias could further improve the recommendation accuracy. We release our code at https://github.com/zyang1580/PDA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3404835.3462875

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Feng, F., He, X., Wei, T., Song, C., Ling, G., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-07-11
Pages
11-20
OpenAlex
W3156939347
Cited by
443
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 10
FWCI
61.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19A2079, 61972372)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0106000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
popularity bias, recommender systems, causal intervention, confounding, long-tail items, collaborative filtering, latent factor models, top-k recommendation, bias amplification, personal digital assistants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review