Exploring the Perspectives of Teachers of the Visually Impaired Regarding Accessible K12 Computing Education
Abstract
As the computing job market continues to expand, the demand for eligible professionals to fill open positions has increased. In response, diversity efforts seek to broaden the participation of underrepresented populations in computing. This movement towards broadening participation includes blind or visually impaired (BVI) people who, historically, have faced barriers in succeeding in a primarily visually-oriented field. The present literature has examined modifying current tools for greater accessibility for BVI people and developing new, more inclusive learning environments. We argue, however, for additional investigation into the accessibility of computing education from the lens of instructors who teach computing to BVI students. Our paper reports on findings from interviews investigating the learning experience of BVI students in computer science courses from the perspective of teachers of the visually impaired (TVI). We interviewed K12 TVIs regarding their experience teaching students how to code, preparing lectures to accommodate their students' needs, and the resources they believe are necessary to help teachers provide more accessible instruction to the students. Our findings revealed that despite the recent improvements to increase accessibility in K12 computer science curricula, challenges still exist regarding the technology used by BVI students and the lack of accessible learning materials available to teachers. Additionally, our participants offer suggestions of resources to help K12 teachers in providing more accessible instruction to their students. The findings may benefit those interested in improving accessibility in computing education for students with disabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three papers focused on K-12 and/or specialist teachers such as TVIs and involved no disabled students.
“Three papers focused on K-12 and/or specialist teachers such as TVIs (e.g., [23, 24]) and involved no disabled students.”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Two of the 10 papers focused on teaching specifically to disabled students, and one paper was about teaching accessibly to all students.
“Two of the 10 papers focused on teaching specifically to disabled students (e.g., [23]), and one paper was about teaching accessibly to all students [24].”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
CER commonly studies teaching practices when general and specialized educators work with disabled students.
“While CER commonly studies teaching practices when general and specialized educators work with disabled students (e.g., [23])”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CodeWalk: Facilitating Shared Awareness in Mixed-Ability Collaborative Software Development
Potluri, V., Pandey, M., Begel, A., Barnett, M., & Reitherman, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544812 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Figueira, I., Cisneros, J. M., Weber, J. L., Sanka, W., Phan, K., Wong-Ma, J., & Branham, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 57th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V.1 · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772561 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huff, E. W., Boateng, K., Moster, M., Rodeghero, P., & Brinkley, J.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-03-03
- Pages
- 156-162
- OpenAlex
- W3135329786
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- visually impaired students, K-12 computer science education, broadening participation in computing, access to educational resources, inclusive education, students with disabilities, coding instructions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review