Cited by 32Teaching and Learning ProgrammingDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Education and Employment

Exploring the Perspectives of Teachers of the Visually Impaired Regarding Accessible K12 Computing Education

Huff, Earl W., Boateng, Kwajo, Moster, Makayla, Rodeghero, Paige, Brinkley, Julian·2021·Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Abstract

As the computing job market continues to expand, the demand for eligible professionals to fill open positions has increased. In response, diversity efforts seek to broaden the participation of underrepresented populations in computing. This movement towards broadening participation includes blind or visually impaired (BVI) people who, historically, have faced barriers in succeeding in a primarily visually-oriented field. The present literature has examined modifying current tools for greater accessibility for BVI people and developing new, more inclusive learning environments. We argue, however, for additional investigation into the accessibility of computing education from the lens of instructors who teach computing to BVI students. Our paper reports on findings from interviews investigating the learning experience of BVI students in computer science courses from the perspective of teachers of the visually impaired (TVI). We interviewed K12 TVIs regarding their experience teaching students how to code, preparing lectures to accommodate their students' needs, and the resources they believe are necessary to help teachers provide more accessible instruction to the students. Our findings revealed that despite the recent improvements to increase accessibility in K12 computer science curricula, challenges still exist regarding the technology used by BVI students and the lack of accessible learning materials available to teachers. Additionally, our participants offer suggestions of resources to help K12 teachers in providing more accessible instruction to their students. The findings may benefit those interested in improving accessibility in computing education for students with disabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3408877.3432418

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huff, E. W., Boateng, K., Moster, M., Rodeghero, P., & Brinkley, J.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-03-03
Pages
156-162
OpenAlex
W3135329786
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
visually impaired students, K-12 computer science education, broadening participation in computing, access to educational resources, inclusive education, students with disabilities, coding instructions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review