Cited by 145Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

FashionQ: An AI-Driven Creativity Support Tool for Facilitating Ideation in Fashion Design

Jeon, Youngseung, Jin, Seungwan, Shih, Patrick C., Han, Kyungsik·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Recent research on creativity support tools (CST) adopts artificial intelligence (AI) that leverages big data and computational capabilities to facilitate creative work. Our work aims to articulate the role of AI in supporting creativity with a case study of an AI-based CST tool in fashion design based on theoretical groundings. We developed AI models by externalizing three cognitive operations (extending, constraining, and blending) that are associated with divergent and convergent thinking. We present FashionQ, an AI-based CST that has three interactive visualization tools (StyleQ, TrendQ, and MergeQ). Through interviews and a user study with 20 fashion design professionals (10 participants for the interviews and 10 for the user study), we demonstrate the effectiveness of FashionQ on facilitating divergent and convergent thinking and identify opportunities and challenges of incorporating AI in the ideation process. Our findings highlight the role and use of AI in each cognitive operation based on professionals’ expertise and suggest future implications of AI-based CST development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3411764.3445093

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI leverages large data to provide a natural language interface for idea generation, promising to be a solution for designers to overcome issues of lack of originality.

    “GenAI leverages large data to provide a natural language interface for idea generation, promising to be a solution for designers to overcome issues of lack of originality [40], applied in domains like fashion [34] and design sketching [5, 29].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 70 · Cited by 145

Authors
Jeon, Y., Jin, S., Shih, P. C., & Han, K.
Affiliations
  • Ajou University (KR)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-05-06
Pages
1-18
OpenAlex
W3161188800
Cited by
145
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
54.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
IITP(Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation) (2019-0-01584)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
creativity support tools, fashion design, idea generation, divergent thinking, convergent thinking, cognitive processes, AI-assisted design, interactive visualization, design professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review