Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Filtering and Informing the Design Space: Towards Design-Space Thinking

Halskov, Kim, Lundqvist, Caroline·2021·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

Building on the concept “prototypes that filter the design space,” we establish how other kinds of design artifacts and activities (e.g., sketching, tests, concept posters, metaphors, design tools) are equally critical in filtering the design space. We also suggest a parallel term, “informing the design space,” to define how design artifacts and activities expand the design space. We focus on a 16-month, full-scale media architecture design project and zero in on seven of its component events, and use design-space schemas to shed light on the dynamics of the design space with respect to informing and filtering the design space. Our concluding contribution is to propose design-space thinking as a sub-discipline of design research. We argue that this research perspective serves to address the creative aspects of the design process, the generative potential of design-space thinking, and the tools that support design-space thinking and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3434462

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1145/2317956.2317967 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/332040.332473 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/2598510.2598533 · DOI
  4. Bucci Paul, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17)
  5. Bullivant Lucy, 2006, Responsive Environments: Architecture, Art and Design. Harry N.
  6. 10.1145/97243.97263 · DOI
  7. Dalsgaard Peter, 2017, Instruments of inquiry: Understanding the nature and role of tools in design, International Journal of Design, 11, 21
  8. 10.1145/1753326.1753670 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/1978942.1979097 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/2858036.2858318 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/2971485.2971528 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1145/3240167.3240190 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/3170427.3188395 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00022-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/223904.223964 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1145/1978942.1979169 · DOI
  18. Haeusler Hank, 2009, Media Facades: History, Technology, Content
  19. 10.1080/14626268.2010.502236 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/1978822.1978841 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1142405.1142409 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.destud.2013.04.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/3360325 · DOI
  24. Halskov Kim, 2008, Virtual video prototyping. Human–Computer Interaction 21, 2
  25. Hassenzahl Marc, 2000, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 12, 3--4
  26. Höök Kristina, 2012, Strong concepts. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction 19, 3
  27. 10.1145/2556288.2557004 · DOI
  28. Kelley Tom, The Art of Innovation
  29. 10.1145/2682884.2682896 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/1375761.1375762 · DOI · Paper page
  31. MacLean Allan, 1991, Moran
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.14236/ewic/HCI2011.57 · DOI
  34. McCullough Malcolm, 2004, Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing
  35. 10.1145/3064663.3064692 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/14626268.2013.855239 · DOI
  37. 10.1145/169059.169143 · DOI
  38. Alexander, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11)
  39. 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929 · DOI
  40. Sanders Elizabeth B.-N., 2005, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. University of the Arts, Bremen, 1--14
  41. Elizabeth, Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference.
  42. 10.1145/3173225.3173259 · DOI
  43. Schön Donald A., Cambridge University Press
  44. Schön Donald A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
  45. 10.1007/s12193-010-0042-4 · DOI
  46. 10.1109/MS.2011.121 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Simon Herbert A., The Sciences of the Artificial
  48. Stolterman Erik, 2010, Concept-driven interaction design research. Human–Computer Interaction 25, 2
  49. Wensveen Stephan, Prototypes and prototyping in design research, 10.4324/9781315758466-25 · DOI
  50. Westerlund Bo, 2005, Proceedings of the Nordes Conference.
  51. 10.1145/2639189.2639487 · DOI
  52. 10.1145/2212776.2212419 · DOI
  53. 10.1145/1979742.1979491 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/S0890060406060057 · DOI
  56. 10.1145/1240624.1240704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Halskov, K., & Lundqvist, C.
Affiliations
Digital Design and Information Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2021-01-20
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 1073-0516
  • 1557-7325
Cited by
38
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review