Evaluating the Success of E-Learning Systems and Strategy Creation: The Perspective of Students in Universitas Indonesia
Abstract
The growth of internet usage has led to changes in digitalization and also boost the increased development in Information and Communication Technology. This development brings various innovation and development in various sectors, one of which is in education. The result of information technology innovation in the education field leads to a stimulus of the adoption of e-learning as the answer for distance-based learning methods. Based on a previous survey conducted, it is found that as many as 65% of well-known faculties in the world have used open educational resources in their teaching methods. It becomes a powerful medium of learning and catalyst that enhance knowledge, skills, and other positive outcomes of learners. The existence of e-learning in higher education is considered more important in the present, especially due to the global pandemic all over the world. This study using the Evaluating E-learning System Success model introduced by Al-Fraihat et al. and has been empirically validated by fitting the model to data collected from 401 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) students, 394 social and humanities students and 296 health science students of Universitas Indonesia engaged with LMS. This study was analyzed using PLS-SEM method and shows that perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and use in the e-learning system positively affect the benefits felt by students. As a practical implication, this study created an interactive design in e-l…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our scoping literature review highlights the CS Education community's primary focus on Open Educational Resources [19, 20], followed by Learning Preferences [16] and Technology Adoption [35].
“Our scoping literature review highlights the CS Education community's primary focus on Open Educational Resources [19, 20], followed by Learning Preferences [16] and Technology Adoption [35].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paterson, J., Oyelere, S. S., Dubay, C., & Izu, C. (2025) · Working Group Reports of the ACM Global Computing Education Conference 2025 · doi:10.1145/3815397.3815774
- Authors
- Rosetta, A., Agatha Priska, M., Muslim, E., & Rafi, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Department of Industrial Engineering Universitas Indonesia
- ORCID
- Rafi, Muhammad
- Venue
- 2020 The 4th International Conference on Education and E-Learning
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-11-06
- Pages
- 11-17
- OpenAlex
- W3135230490
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- student satisfaction, perceived usefulness, e-learning strategy, virtual learning environments, higher education, STEM students, health sciences students, Universitas Indonesia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review