Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are we really making much progress?: Revisiting, benchmarking and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks

Lv, Qingsong, Ding, Ming, Liu, Qiang, Chen, Yuxiang, Feng, Wenzheng, He, Siming, Zhou, Chang, Jiang, Jianguo, Dong, Yuxiao, Tang, Jie·2021·Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

Abstract

Heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs) have been blossoming in recent years, but the unique data processing and evaluation setups used by each work obstruct a full understanding of their advancements. In this work, we present a systematical reproduction of 12 recent HGNNs by using their official codes, datasets, settings, and hyperparameters, revealing surprising findings about the progress of HGNNs. We find that the simple homogeneous GNNs, e.g., GCN and GAT, are largely underestimated due to improper settings. GAT with proper inputs can generally match or outperform all existing HGNNs across various scenarios. To facilitate robust and reproducible HGNN research, we construct the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) , consisting of 11 diverse datasets with three tasks. HGB standardizes the process of heterogeneous graph data splits, feature processing, and performance evaluation. Finally, we introduce a simple but very strong baseline Simple-HGN-which significantly outperforms all previous models on HGB-to accelerate the advancement of HGNNs in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3447548.3467350

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Metadata

Authors
Lv, Q., Ding, M., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Feng, W., He, S., Zhou, C., Jiang, J., Dong, Y., & Tang, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-08-14
Pages
1150-1160
OpenAlex
W4285378361
Cited by
292
References
26
FWCI
18.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are we really making much progress?: Revisiting, benchmarking and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3447548.3467350
The paper
Lv, Q., Ding, M., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Feng, W., He, S., Zhou, C., Jiang, J., Dong, Y., & Tang, J. (2021). Are we really making much progress?: Revisiting, benchmarking and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.