The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Deep Knowledge Tracking Model Integrating Difficulty Factors
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence education, it is of great significance to establish a scientific and effective model of learners' knowledge mastery state. Knowledge tracking (KT) as a modeling method for learners to infer knowledge level based on their learning achievements, plays a key role in intelligent education system. There are some problems in the existing knowledge tracking models, such as incomplete input features and unstable model. In order to improve the accuracy of the prediction of learners' learning effect, this paper proposes a deep knowledge tracking model (DDKT) based on the comprehensive difficulty of the topic. The model mainly includes two parts: on the one hand, the construction of the comprehensive difficulty model, on the other hand, the improvement of the model. The model combines topic difficulty with deep knowledge tracking model, enriches learners' learning process dimensions and improves the generalization ability of the model. Through comparative experiments, it is proved that the DDKT model has achieved better results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Building upon the foundational approaches like Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) (Corbett and Anderson, 1994) and Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT) (Piech et al., 2015), recent research has advanced KT by incorporating behavioral data, such as response times (Song et al., 2021), scaffolding interactions (Asselman et al., 2020), and attempt counts (Sun et al., 2022).”
From Knowledge Tracing in Programming Education Integrating Students’ Questions (2025) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Romero C., 2011, Handbook of Educational Data Mining
- 10.5555/2969239.2969296 · doi:10.5555/2969239.2969296
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.03.002 · DOI
- Direnga J., 2015, REES 2015, Research in Engineering Education Symposium
- Fouh E., 2016, Educational Data Mining
- Corbett A. T., 1994, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 4, 253
- 10.1145/3231644.3231647 · DOI · Paper page
- Wauters K., 2011, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on educational data mining, 121
- 10.5555/3298239.3298437 · doi:10.5555/3298239.3298437
- 10.1177/0146621611407305 · DOI
- 10.1109/CIST.2018.8596370 · DOI
Cited by
Knowledge Tracing in Programming Education Integrating Students’ Questions
Kim, D., Kim, S., & Jo, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1343 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, Z., Huang, S., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Guilin University of Electronic Technology
- University College London
- Venue
- The 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-01-28
- Pages
- 1-5
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.