An experimental comparison of naive Bayesian and keyword-based anti-spam filtering with personal e-mail messages
Open accessAbstract
The growing problem of unsolicited bulk e-mail, also known as “spam”, has generated a need for reliable anti-spam e-mail filters. Filters of this type have so far been based mostly on manually constructed keyword patterns. An alternative approach has recently been proposed, whereby a Naive Bayesian classifier is trained automatically to detect spam messages. We test this approach on a large collection of personal e-mail messages, which we make publicly available in “encrypted” form contributing towards standard benchmarks. We introduce appropriate cost-sensitive measures, investigating at the same time the effect of attribute-set size, training-corpus size, lemmatization, and stop lists, issues that have not been explored in previous experiments. Finally, the Naive Bayesian filter is compared, in terms of performance, to a filter that uses keyword patterns, and which is part of a widely used e-mail reader.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employing keyword filtering and discriminative models may effectively prevent the inclusion of inappropriate data.
“To mitigate these risks, employing keyword filtering and discriminative models may effectively prevent the inclusion of such inappropriate data [168, 169].”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [168]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of learning-based techniques of email spam filtering
Blanzieri, E., & Bryl, A. (2008) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9109-6 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Combining psycho-linguistic, content-based and chat-based features to detect predation in chatrooms
Barreiro, A., Losada, D. E., & Parapar, J. (2014) · Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz · doi:10.3217/jucs-020-02-0213 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Furthermore, compared to non-parametric memory, the characteristics of parametric memory storing information implicitly within AI models are more akin to how the human brain produces new neurons or undergoes chemical changes [84, 86, 87, 88].”
- Authors
- Androutsopoulos, I., Koutsias, J., Chandrinos, K. V., & Spyropoulos, C. D.
- Affiliations
- National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" (GR)
- ORCID
- Androutsopoulos, Ion
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2000-07
- Pages
- 160-167
- OpenAlex
- W2085302848
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- spam filtering, naive Bayesian classifier, keyword-based filtering, training corpus size, lemmatization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review