The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization
Abstract
A multiple view system uses two or more distinct views to support the investigation of a single conceptual entity. Many such systems exist, ranging from computer-aided design (CAD) systems for chip design that display both the logical structure and the actual geometry of the integrated circuit to overview-plus-detail systems that show both an overview for context and a zoomed-in-view for detail. Designers of these systems must make a variety of design decisions, ranging from determining layout to constructing sophisticated coordination mechanisms. Surprisingly, little work has been done to characterize these systems or to express guidelines for their design. Based on a workshop discussion of multiple views, and based on our own design and implementation experience with these systems, we present eight guidelines for the design of multiple view systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion
Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004 · Cited by 997
Human factors in visualization research
Tory, M., & Moller, T. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2004.1260759 · Cited by 420
Evaluating Information Visualizations
Carpendale, S. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_2 · Cited by 364
Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018 · Cited by 316
North, C., & Shneiderman, B. (2000) · Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces · doi:10.1145/345513.345282 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang Baldonado, M. Q., Woodruff, A., & Kuchinsky, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2000-05
- Pages
- 110-119
- OpenAlex
- W2106281550
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/345513.345271
- The paper
- Wang Baldonado, M. Q., Woodruff, A., & Kuchinsky, A. (2000). Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1145/345513.345271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
