Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Maps

Open access
Derrow-Pinion, Austin, She, Jennifer, Wong, David, Lange, Oliver, Hester, Todd, Perez, Luis, Nunkesser, Marc, Lee, Seongjae, Guo, Xueying, Wiltshire, Brett, Battaglia, Peter W., Gupta, Vishal, Li, Ang, Xu, Zhongwen, Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro, Li, Yujia, Velickovic, Petar·2021·Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Abstract

Travel-time prediction constitutes a task of high importance in transportation networks, with web mapping services like Google Maps regularly serving vast quantities of travel time queries from users and enterprises alike. Further, such a task requires accounting for complex spatiotemporal interactions (modelling both the topological properties of the road network and anticipating events---such as rush hours---that may occur in the future). Hence, it is an ideal target for graph representation learning at scale. Here we present a graph neural network estimator for estimated time of arrival (ETA) which we have deployed in production at Google Maps. While our main architecture consists of standard GNN building blocks, we further detail the usage of training schedule methods such as MetaGradients in order to make our model robust and production-ready. We also provide prescriptive studies: ablating on various architectural decisions and training regimes, and qualitative analyses on real-world situations where our model provides a competitive edge. Our GNN proved powerful when deployed, significantly reducing negative ETA outcomes in several regions compared to the previous production baseline (40+% in cities like Sydney).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3459637.3481916

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Derrow-Pinion, A., She, J., Wong, D., Lange, O., Hester, T., Perez, L., Nunkesser, M., Lee, S., Guo, X., Wiltshire, B., Battaglia, P. W., Gupta, V., Li, A., Xu, Z., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Li, Y., & Velickovic, P.
Venue
Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-10-26
Pages
3767-3776
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194259208
Cited by
208
References
6
FWCI
76.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3459637.3481916
The paper
Derrow-Pinion, A., She, J., Wong, D., Lange, O., Hester, T., Perez, L., Nunkesser, M., Lee, S., Guo, X., Wiltshire, B., Battaglia, P. W., Gupta, V., Li, A., Xu, Z., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Li, Y., & Velickovic, P. (2021). ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Maps. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3481916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.