The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computing and Maintaining Provenance of Query Result Probabilities in Uncertain Knowledge Graphs
Abstract
Knowledge graphs (KG) model relationships between entities as labeled edges (or facts). They are mostly constructed using a suite of automated extractors, thereby inherently leading to uncertainty in the extracted facts. Modeling the uncertainty as probabilistic confidence scores results in a probabilistic knowledge graph. Graph queries over such probabilistic KGs require answer computation along with the computation of result probabilities, i.e., probabilistic inference. We propose a system, HAPPI (How Provenance of Probabilistic Inference), to handle such query processing and inference. Complying with the standard provenance semiring model, we propose a novel commutative semiring to symbolically compute the probability of the result of a query. These provenance-polynomial-like symbolic expressions encode fine-grained information about the probability computation process. We leverage this encoding to efficiently compute as well as maintain probabilities of results even as the underlying KG changes. Focusing on conjunctive basic graph pattern queries, we observe that HAPPI is more efficient than knowledge compilation for answering commonly occurring queries with lower range of probability derivation complexity. We propose an adaptive system that leverages the strengths of both HAPPI and compilation based techniques, for not only to perform efficient probabilistic inference and compute their provenance, but also to incrementally maintain them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance
Buneman, P., Khanna, S., & Wang-Chiew, T. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44503-x_20 · Cited by 1,334
YAGO2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia
Hoffart, J., Suchanek, F. M., Berberich, K., & Weikum, G. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.001 · Cited by 1,232
Efficient query evaluation on probabilistic databases
Dalvi, N., & Suciu, D. (2007) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-006-0004-3 · Cited by 962
Green, T. J., Karvounarakis, G., & Tannen, V. (2007) · Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems · doi:10.1145/1265530.1265535 · Cited by 812
Wu, W., Li, H., Wang, H., & Zhu, K. Q. (2012) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/2213836.2213891 · Cited by 781
The RDF-3X engine for scalable management of RDF data
Neumann, T., & Weikum, G. (2009) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-009-0165-y · Cited by 635
On the hardness of approximate reasoning
Roth, D. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00092-1 · Cited by 611
Darwiche, A., & Marquis, P. (2002) · Cited by 602
A probabilistic relational algebra for the integration of information retrieval and database systems
Fuhr, N., & Rölleke, T. (1997) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/239041.239045 · Cited by 398
Efficient Top-k Query Evaluation on Probabilistic Data
Ré, C., Dalvi, N. N., & Suciu, D. M. (2007) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2007.367934 · Cited by 365
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.5555/1182635.1164231 · doi:10.5555/1182635.1164231
- 10.5555/645504.656274 · doi:10.5555/645504.656274
- 10.5555/645914.671645 · doi:10.5555/645914.671645
- 10.5555/3000001.3000069 · doi:10.5555/3000001.3000069
- 10.5555/3164891 · doi:10.5555/3164891
- 10.5555/1325851.1326038 · doi:10.5555/1325851.1326038
- Anthony Fader , Stephen Soderland , and Oren Etzioni . 2011. Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction . Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . Anthony Fader, Stephen Soderland, and Oren Etzioni. 2011. Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- Garima Gaur Abhishek Dang Arnab Bhattacharya and Srikanta Bedathur. 2021. Computing and Maintaining Provenance of Query Result Probabilities in Uncertain Knowledge Graphs. arxiv: 2108.07758 [cs.DB] Garima Gaur Abhishek Dang Arnab Bhattacharya and Srikanta Bedathur. 2021. Computing and Maintaining Provenance of Query Result Probabilities in Uncertain Knowledge Graphs. arxiv: 2108.07758 [cs.DB] · arXiv
- 10.5555/3171642.3171738 · doi:10.5555/3171642.3171738
- 10.5555/2886521.2886641 · doi:10.5555/2886521.2886641
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaur, G., Dang, A., Bhattacharya, A., & Bedathur, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-10-26
- Pages
- 545-554
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 42
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computing and Maintaining Provenance of Query Result Probabilities in Uncertain Knowledge Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3459637.3482330
- The paper
- Gaur, G., Dang, A., Bhattacharya, A., & Bedathur, S. (2021). Computing and Maintaining Provenance of Query Result Probabilities in Uncertain Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.