Transformer-based Feature Reconstruction Network for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Abstract
Improving robustness against data missing has become one of the core challenges in Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA), which aims to judge speaker sentiments from the language, visual, and acoustic signals. In the current research, translation-based methods and tensor regularization methods are proposed for MSA with incomplete modality features. However, both of them fail to cope with random modality feature missing in non-aligned sequences. In this paper, a transformer-based feature reconstruction network (TFR-Net) is proposed to improve the robustness of models for the random missing in non-aligned modality sequences. First, intra-modal and inter-modal attention-based extractors are adopted to learn robust representations for each element in modality sequences. Then, a reconstruction module is proposed to generate the missing modality features. With the supervision of SmoothL1Loss between generated and complete sequences, TFR-Net is expected to learn semantic-level features corresponding to missing features. Extensive experiments on two public benchmark datasets show that our model achieves good results against data missing across various missing modality combinations and various missing degrees.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On CMU-MOSI, the MIB variants obtain the best performance on the majority of the evaluation metrics.
“For CMU-MOSI dataset, although TFR-Net [54] performs better than the existing methods and sets up a high baseline, our MIB variants still obtain the best performance on the majority of the evaluation metrics.”
From Multimodal Information Bottleneck: Learning Minimal Sufficient Unimodal and Multimodal Representations (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
E-MIB achieves the best results on all metrics on CMU-MOSI and outperforms TFR-Net by 6.0% on Acc7, 1.3% on Acc2, and 1.4% on F1 score.
“Specifically, E-MIB achieves the best results on all metrics, and it outperforms TFR-Net [54] by 6.0% on Acc7, 1.3% on Acc2 and 1.4% on F1 score.”
From Multimodal Information Bottleneck: Learning Minimal Sufficient Unimodal and Multimodal Representations (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Yuan, Z., Li, W., Xu, H., & Yu, W.
- Affiliations
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-10-17
- Pages
- 4400-4407
- OpenAlex
- W3206201541
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program Projects of China (2018YFC1707605)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- multimodal sentiment analysis, missing modality robustness, feature reconstruction, transformer models, attention-based feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review