Cited by 211Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Transformer-based Feature Reconstruction Network for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

Yuan, Ziqi, Li, Wei, Xu, Hua, Yu, Wenmeng·2021·Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Improving robustness against data missing has become one of the core challenges in Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA), which aims to judge speaker sentiments from the language, visual, and acoustic signals. In the current research, translation-based methods and tensor regularization methods are proposed for MSA with incomplete modality features. However, both of them fail to cope with random modality feature missing in non-aligned sequences. In this paper, a transformer-based feature reconstruction network (TFR-Net) is proposed to improve the robustness of models for the random missing in non-aligned modality sequences. First, intra-modal and inter-modal attention-based extractors are adopted to learn robust representations for each element in modality sequences. Then, a reconstruction module is proposed to generate the missing modality features. With the supervision of SmoothL1Loss between generated and complete sequences, TFR-Net is expected to learn semantic-level features corresponding to missing features. Extensive experiments on two public benchmark datasets show that our model achieves good results against data missing across various missing modality combinations and various missing degrees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3474085.3475585

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 211

Authors
Yuan, Z., Li, W., Xu, H., & Yu, W.
Affiliations
Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-10-17
Pages
4400-4407
OpenAlex
W3206201541
Cited by
211
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 10
FWCI
10.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key R&D Program Projects of China (2018YFC1707605)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multimodal sentiment analysis, missing modality robustness, feature reconstruction, transformer models, attention-based feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review