The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Planetary digital twin: a case study in aquaculture
Abstract
Precision agriculture and aquaculture offer a new way of creating a production system that is efficient and eco-friendly with the potential to increase food availability to wider communities across the globe. Digital technologies and applied computing play a crucial role to aid local farmers in better control of production losses. This paper addresses whether it is feasible to deploy a virtual digital replica of aquaculture farms to control essential water quality variables, including temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, turbidity and ammonia. Traditional IoT systems can offer monitoring capabilities. However, this emerging application requires real-time control-based actuation to intervene in the environment. Often, farmers have limited time to react to any anomalous event. The proposed Planetary Digital Twin employs AI-based control loops to monitor, simulate and optimize aquaculture processes and assets. Preliminary system validation results suggest the approach is feasible in communicating real-time sensor data to a mechanism to detect and control anomalies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These sectors have recently seen a boom in adopting the DT idea [7,8].”
From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Shanzhi Chen, Hui Xu, Dake Liu, Bo Hu, and Hucheng Wang. 2014. A Vision of IoT: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities with Chinas Perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1 (2014).
- Sajjad Hussain Shah and Ilyas Yaqoob. 2016. A Survey: Internet of Things (IOT) Technologies, Applications and Challenges. IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (2016).
- Dhananjay Singh, Gaurav Tripathi, and Antonio J Jara. 2014. A survey of Internet-of-Things: Future vision, architecture, challenges and services. In 2014 IEEE world forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 287--292.
- Royal Society. 2020. Digital technology and the planet: Harnessing computing to achieve net zero. The Royal Society, London.
Metadata
- Authors
- Teixeira, R., Puccinelli, J., de Vargas Guterres, B., Pias, M. R., Oliveira, V. M., Botelho, S. S. D. C., Poersch, L., Filho, N. D., Janati, A., & Paris, M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
- Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG). Rio Grande - RS. Brazil
- BIOCEANOR. Sophia Antipolis. France
- ORCID
- Pias, Marcelo Rita
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-04-25
- Pages
- 191-197
- OpenAlex
- W4229023717
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Union?s Horizon 2020 (863034)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
- Keywords
- digital twin, aquaculture, precision agriculture, water quality monitoring, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, turbidity, pH, real-time control, anomaly detection, Internet of Things
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
