Cited by 72Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesTopic Modeling

Learning Discrete Representations via Constrained Clustering for Effective and Efficient Dense Retrieval

Open access
Zhan, Jingtao, Mao, Jiaxin, Liu, Yiqun, Guo, Jiafeng, Zhang, Min, Ma, Shaoping·2022·Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining

Abstract

Dense Retrieval (DR) has achieved state-of-the-art first-stage ranking effectiveness. However, the efficiency of most existing DR models is limited by the large memory cost of storing dense vectors and the time-consuming nearest neighbor search (NNS) in vector space. Therefore, we present RepCONC, a novel retrieval model that learns discrete Representations via CONstrained Clustering. RepCONC jointly trains dual-encoders and the Product Quantization (PQ) method to learn discrete document representations and enables fast approximate NNS with compact indexes. It models quantization as a constrained clustering process, which requires the document embeddings to be uniformly clustered around the quantization centroids and supports end-to-end optimization of the quantization method and dual-encoders. We theoretically demonstrate the importance of the uniform clustering constraint in RepCONC and derive an efficient approximate solution for constrained clustering by reducing it to an instance of the optimal transport problem. Besides constrained clustering, RepCONC further adopts a vector-based inverted file system (IVF) to support highly efficient vector search on CPUs. Extensive experiments on two popular ad-hoc retrieval benchmarks show that RepCONC achieves better ranking effectiveness than competitive vector quantization baselines under different compression ratio settings. It also substantially outperforms a wide range of existing retrieval models in terms of retrieval effectiveness, memory efficiency, and time efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3488560.3498443

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of a learned codebook for implicit token vectors is theoretically the same as a dense retrieval system that uses cluster-based product quantization.

    “Also, the use of a learned codebook for implicit token vectors is theoretically the same with a dense retrieval system that uses cluster-based product quantization [139, 143].”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [139]

  • Dense retrieval models built with product quantization and inverted file systems can achieve state-of-the-art retrieval performance with similar latency and less storage than term-based models with inverted indexes.

    “Considering that dense retrieval models built with product quantization and inverted file systems can achieve state-of-the-art retrieval performance with similar latency and less storage than term-based models with inverted indexes [139]”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [139]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 72

Authors
Zhan, J., Mao, J., Liu, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, M., & Ma, S.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-02-11
Pages
1328-1336
OpenAlex
W3205509771
Cited by
72
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1
FWCI
14.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61732008, 61532011, 61902209, U2001212)
  • Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI)
  • Intelligent Social Governance Platform, Major Innovation & Planning Interdisciplinary Platform for the Double-First Class Initiative, Renmin University of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0831700)
  • Tsinghua University Guoqiang Research Institute
  • Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (NO. BJJWZYJH012019100020098)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
dense retrieval, discrete representations, constrained clustering, product quantization, vector quantization, approximate nearest neighbor search, optimal transport, dual-encoder retrieval, memory efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review