The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography
Open accessAbstract
We survey the literature available on the topic of domain-specific languages as used for the construction and maintenance of software systems. We list a selection of 75 key publications in the area, and provide a summary for each of the papers. Moreover, we discuss terminology, risks and benefits, example domain-specific languages, design methodologies, and implementation techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
When and how to develop domain-specific languages
Mernik, M., Heering, J., & Sloane, A. M. (2005) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1118890.1118892 · Cited by 1,748
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015) · Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2787622.2787721 · Cited by 198
Sandkuhl, K., Fill, H.-G., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Krogstie, J., Matthes, F., Opdahl, A., Schwabe, G., Uludag, Ö., & Winter, R. (2018) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0516-y · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- van Deursen, A., Klint, P., & Visser, J.
- Venue
- ACM SIGPLAN Notices
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 26-36
- ISSN
- 0362-1340 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1160
- OpenAlex
- W2155028447
- Cited by
- 1,293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/352029.352035
- The paper
- van Deursen, A., Klint, P., & Visser, J. (2000). Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. https://doi.org/10.1145/352029.352035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
