The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CAT: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Content-Aware Anomaly Detection in Event Sequences
Abstract
It is critical and important to detect anomalies in event sequences, which becomes widely available in many application domains. Indeed, various efforts have been made to capture abnormal patterns from event sequences through sequential pattern analysis or event representation learning. However, existing approaches usually ignore the semantic information of event content. To this end, in this paper, we propose a self-attentive encoder-decoder transformer framework, Content-Aware Transformer CAT, for anomaly detection in event sequences. In CAT, the encoder learns preamble event sequence representations with content awareness, and the decoder embeds sequences under detection into a latent space, where anomalies are distinguishable. Specifically, the event content is first fed to a content-awareness layer, generating representations of each event. The encoder accepts preamble event representation sequence, generating feature maps. In the decoder, an additional token is added at the beginning of the sequence under detection, denoting the sequence status. A one-class objective together with sequence reconstruction loss is collectively applied to train our framework under the label efficiency scheme. Furthermore, CAT is optimized under a scalable and efficient setting. Finally, extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of CAT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most of the reviewed papers evaluate their techniques on HDFS and BGL datasets, typically grouping logs into sequences using sessions and window sizes.
“Most of the papers evaluate their techniques on two public datasets, Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) [51] and Blue Gene/L supercomputer (BGL) [52], typically grouping logs into sequences using sessions and window sizes.”
From Practitioners’ expectations on log anomaly detection (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting
Zhou, H., Zhang, S., Peng, J., Zhang, S., Li, J., Xiong, H., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17325 · Cited by 7,752
Self-citationLogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
Guo, H., Yuan, S., & Wu, X. (2021) · 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534113 · Cited by 454
Failure Prediction in IBM BlueGene/L Event Logs
Liang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiong, H., & Sahoo, R. (2007) · Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2007.46 · Cited by 292
Self-citationSelf-Attentive Classification-Based Anomaly Detection in Unstructured Logs
Nedelkoski, S., Bogatinovski, J., Acker, A., Cardoso, J., & Kao, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00148 · Cited by 176
LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
Guo, H., Yuan, S., & Wu, X. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.04475 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1145/1755913.1755926 · DOI
- 10.1137/1.9781611972788.22 · DOI
- 10.1145/342009.335388 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.2007248 · DOI
- Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. 2010. Anomaly detection for discrete sequences: A survey. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 24, 5 (2010), 823--839.
- Rui Chen, Shenglin Zhang, Dongwen Li, Yuzhe Zhang, Fangrui Guo, Weibin Meng, Dan Pei, Yuzhi Zhang, Xu Chen, and Yuqing Liu. 2020. LogTransfer: Cross-system log anomaly detection for software systems with transfer learning. In ISSRE. IEEE, 37--47.
- Sung-Bae Cho and Hyuk-Jang Park. 2003. Efficient anomaly detection by modeling privilege flows using hidden Markov model. computers & security 22, 1 (2003), 45--55.
- Djork-Arné Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2015. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289 (2015). · arXiv
- Christophe Combet, Christophe Blanchet, Christophe Geourjon, and Gilbert Deleage. 2000. NPS@: network protein sequence analysis. Trends in biochemical sciences 25, 3 (2000), 147--150.
- 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793887 · DOI
- 10.1145/3133956.3134015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.icte.2020.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11235-018-0475-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/MTS.2011.940293 · DOI
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.
- 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3034647 · DOI
- 10.1145/2889160.2889232 · DOI
- Fei Tony Liu, Kai Ming Ting, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2008. Isolation forest. In 2008 eighth ieee international conference on data mining. IEEE, 413--422.
- Zhen Liu, Nathalie Japkowicz, Ruoyu Wang, Yongming Cai, Deyu Tang, and Xianfa Cai. 2020. A statistical pattern based feature extraction method on system call traces for anomaly detection. Information and Software Technology 126 (2020).
- Jian-Guang Lou, Qiang Fu, Shengqi Yang, Ye Xu, and Jiang Li. 2010. Mining Invariants from Console Logs for System Problem Detection. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 1--14.
- Song-song Lu, Xiao-feng Wang, and Li Mao. 2014. Network security situation awareness based on network simulation. In 2014 IEEE workshop on electronics, computer and applications. IEEE, 512--517.
- 10.1109/ICCCN49398.2020.9209707 · DOI
- Weibin Meng, Ying Liu, Yichen Zhu, Shenglin Zhang, Dan Pei, Yuqing Liu, Yihao Chen, Ruizhi Zhang, Shimin Tao, Pei Sun, et al. 2019. LogAnomaly: Unsupervised Detection of Sequential and Quantitative Anomalies in Unstructured Logs. In IJCAI, Vol. 19. 4739--4745.
- Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013). · arXiv
- Adam Oliner and Jon Stearley. 2007. What supercomputers say: A study of five system logs. In 37th annual IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks (DSN'07). IEEE, 575--584.
- 10.3115/v1/D14-1162 · DOI · Paper page
- Bernhard Schölkopf, John C Platt, John Shawe-Taylor, Alex J Smola, and Robert C Williamson. 2001. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural computation 13, 7 (2001), 1443--1471.
- David MJ Tax and Robert PW Duin. 2004. Support vector data description. Machine learning 54, 1 (2004), 45--66.
- Ashish Vaswani Noam Shazeer Niki Parmar Jakob Uszkoreit Llion Jones Aidan N Gomez Lukasz Kaiser and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998--6008.
- ZhiweiWang, Zhengzhang Chen, Jingchao Ni, Hui Liu, Haifeng Chen, and Jiliang Tang. 2021. Multi-scale one-class recurrent neural networks for discrete event sequence anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3726--3734.
- 10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766910 · DOI
- Bryan Watkins. 2014. The impact of cyber attacks on the private sector. Briefing Paper, Association for International Affair 12 (2014), 1--11.
- 10.1109/COMST.2014.2336610 · DOI
- 10.1145/1629575.1629587 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00130 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNSM.2021.3125967 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/qre.2364 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges
Cheng, Q., Sahoo, D., Saha, A., Yang, W., Liu, C., Woo, G., Singh, M., Saverese, S., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.04661 · Cited by 23
Practitioners’ expectations on log anomaly detection
Ma, X., Li, Y., Keung, J., Yu, X., Zou, H., Yang, Z., Sarro, F., & Barr, E. T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3586700 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Cheng, W., Chen, H., & Xiong, H.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA
- NEC Labs America, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-08-14
- Pages
- 4541-4550
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 6
- Funders
- NSF (National Science Foundation) (III-2006387, III-2040799, III-1814510)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review