Cited by 5Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

Graph-based Multilingual Language Model: Leveraging Product Relations for Search Relevance

Open access
Choudhary, Nurendra, Rao, Nikhil, Subbian, Karthik, Reddy, Chandan K.·2022·Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

The large-scale nature of product catalog and the changing demands of customer queries makes product search a challenging problem. The customer queries are ambiguous and implicit. They may be looking for an exact match of their query, or a functional equivalent (i.e., substitute), or an accessory to go with it (i.e., complement). It is important to distinguish these three categories from merely classifying an item for a customer query as relevant or not. This information can help direct the customer and improve search applications to understand the customer mission. In this paper, we formulate search relevance as a multi-class classification problem and propose a graph-based solution to classify a given query-item pair as exact, substitute, complement, or irrelevant (ESCI). The customer engagement (clicks, add-to-cart, and purchases) between query and items serve as a crucial information for this problem. However, existing approaches rely purely on the textual information (such as BERT) and do not sufficiently focus on the structural relationships. Another challenge in including the structural information is the sparsity of such data in some regions. We propose Structure-Aware multilingual LAnguage Model (SALAM), that utilizes a language model along with a graph neural network, to extract region-specific semantics as well as relational information for the classification of query-product pairs. Our model is first pre-trained on a large region-agnostic dataset and behavioral gr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3534678.3539158

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correctly classifying items for a particular user search query for shopping is a challenging problem despite recent advancements in machine learning.

    “Despite the recent advancements in the field of machine learning, correctly classifying items for a particular user search query for shopping is a challenging problem [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choudhary, N., Rao, N., Subbian, K., & Reddy, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-08-14
Pages
2789-2799
OpenAlex
W4291127509
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
product search, graph neural networks, multilingual language models, e-commerce search, pre-training and fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review