Graph-based Multilingual Language Model: Leveraging Product Relations for Search Relevance
Open accessAbstract
The large-scale nature of product catalog and the changing demands of customer queries makes product search a challenging problem. The customer queries are ambiguous and implicit. They may be looking for an exact match of their query, or a functional equivalent (i.e., substitute), or an accessory to go with it (i.e., complement). It is important to distinguish these three categories from merely classifying an item for a customer query as relevant or not. This information can help direct the customer and improve search applications to understand the customer mission. In this paper, we formulate search relevance as a multi-class classification problem and propose a graph-based solution to classify a given query-item pair as exact, substitute, complement, or irrelevant (ESCI). The customer engagement (clicks, add-to-cart, and purchases) between query and items serve as a crucial information for this problem. However, existing approaches rely purely on the textual information (such as BERT) and do not sufficiently focus on the structural relationships. Another challenge in including the structural information is the sparsity of such data in some regions. We propose Structure-Aware multilingual LAnguage Model (SALAM), that utilizes a language model along with a graph neural network, to extract region-specific semantics as well as relational information for the classification of query-product pairs. Our model is first pre-trained on a large region-agnostic dataset and behavioral gr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Correctly classifying items for a particular user search query for shopping is a challenging problem despite recent advancements in machine learning.
“Despite the recent advancements in the field of machine learning, correctly classifying items for a particular user search query for shopping is a challenging problem [5].”
From Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Search (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Nigam, P., Song, Y., Mohan, V., Lakshman, V., Ding, W. (., Shingavi, A., Teo, C. H., Gu, H., & Yin, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330759 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Search
Reddy, C. K., Màrquez, L., Valero, F., Rao, N., Zaragoza, H., Bandyopadhyay, S., Biswas, A., Xing, A., & Subbian, K. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.06588 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Choudhary, N., Rao, N., Subbian, K., & Reddy, C. K.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-08-14
- Pages
- 2789-2799
- OpenAlex
- W4291127509
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- product search, graph neural networks, multilingual language models, e-commerce search, pre-training and fine-tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review